录井工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 46-50.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2022.01.007
刘春锋, 熊志武, 周平
LIU Chunfeng, XIONG Zhiwu, ZHOU Ping
摘要: 西湖凹陷平湖组和花岗组油气层多为凝析气或轻质油层,埋藏普遍偏深、储层物性差,且具有流动性强、极易挥发的特点,由于传统的油气层识别技术所考虑的参数均比较单一,识别效果较差,故应用统计学中判别分析方法,对西湖凹陷低孔低渗油气层进行识别。此方法同时采用5个气测敏感参数作为不同油气层性质的判别参数,建立油气层综合判别函数进行流体性质判别。通过东海西湖凹陷低孔低渗油气层的判别效果来看,油气层识别符合率较传统识别方法显著提高,有效克服了传统储层识别方法的局限性,提高了录井工作效率和识别准确性。
中图分类号:
[1] | 李娜,何小菊,高秀丽,等. 低孔低渗储集层测井评价技术综述与展望[J]. 国外测井技术,2013(3):8-11.LI Na, HE Xiaoju, GAO Xiuli, et al.Overview and prospect of the logging evaluation technology on low porosity and permeability reservoirs[J]. World Well Logging Technology,2013(3):8-11. |
[2] | 杜阳阳,王燕,李亚峰,等. 低孔低渗储层流体性质测录井综合识别方法研究现状与展望[J]. 地球物理学进展,2018,33(2):571-580.DU Yangyang, WANG Yan, LI Yafeng, et al.Research status and outlook of the mud logging and well logging data comprehensive recognition for the low porosity and permeability of the reservoir fluid properties[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2018,33(2):571-580. |
[3] | 陈金龙,黄志龙,董劲,等. 低渗-致密储集层地层含气量估算方法及其应用[J]. 录井工程,2019,30(4):8-12.CHEN Jinlong, HUANG Zhilong, DONG Jin, et al.Formation gas concentration estimation method of low permeability-tight reservoir and its application[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2019,30(4):8-12. |
[4] | 鞠传学,董春梅,张宪国,等. 西湖凹陷花港组低渗透砂岩储层孔隙结构[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2016,32(9):32-40.JU Chuanxue, DONG Chunmei, ZHANG Xianguo, et al.Study on the pore structure of low permeability reservoir of the Huagang Formation in Xihu Depression area[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2016,32(9):32-40. |
[5] | 黄导武,段东平,刘彬彬,等. 西湖凹陷低渗-致密砂岩气藏储层特征及差异成因[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):99-107.HUANG Daowu, DUAN Dongping, LIU Binbin, et al.Reservoir characteristics and differential genesis of low permeability-tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Xihu area sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(3):99-107. |
[6] | 张武,蒋一鸣,肖晓光,等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中北部花港组储层致密化过程分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2021,43(1):86-95.ZHANG Wu, JIANG Yiming, XIAO Xiaoguang, et al.Densification process of Huagang Formation in northern and central Xihu Sag of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2021,43(1):86-95. |
[7] | 张建培,余逸凡,张田,等. 东海西湖凹陷深盆气勘探前景探讨[J]. 中国海上油气,2013,25(2):24-29.ZHANG Jianpei, YU Yifan, ZHANG Tian, et al.A discussion on the exploration potential of deep basin gas in Xihu sag, East China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2013,25(2):24-29. |
[8] | 刘金水,唐健程. 西湖凹陷低渗储层微观孔隙结构与渗流特征及其地质意义:以HY构造花港组为例[J]. 中国海上油气,2013,25(2):18-23.LIU Jinshui, TANG Jiancheng.Microscopic pore texture and percolation features in the low permeability reservoirs and their geological significance in Xihu sag: A case of Huagang Formation in HY structure[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2013,25(2):18-23. |
[9] | 苏奥,陈红汉,陈旭,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平湖构造带致密砂岩储层成岩成藏的耦合关系[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(3):1016-1026.SU Ao, CHEN Honghan, CHEN Xu, et al.Coupling relationship between diagenetic evolution and oil and gas accumulation of tight sandstone reservoir in Pinghu structural belt in Xihu depression, Eastern Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2015,46(3):1016-1026. |
[10] | 庄建建,杨彩虹,颜方方. 西湖凹陷气测录井烃气指数图版的应用[J]. 海洋石油,2013,33(2):94-96.ZHUANG Jianjian, YANG Caihong, YAN Fangfang.Application of gas logging hydrocarbon index in Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2013,33(2):94-96. |
[11] | 王雷,蔡军,景社, 等. 西湖凹陷低渗储集层气测录井定量解释评价方法[J]. 录井工程,2020,31(3):86-89.WANG Lei, CAI Jun, JING She, et al.Quantitative interpretation and evaluation method of gas logging for low permeability reservoirs in Xihu Sag[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(3):86-89. |
[12] | 顾惠荣,叶加仁,郝芳. 东海西湖凹陷平湖构造带油气分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):104-108.GU Huirong, YE Jiaren, HAO Fang.Distribution pattern of oil and gas in Pinghu structural zone in Xihu depression, East China Sea[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(1):104-108. |
[13] | 叶加仁,顾惠荣,贾健谊. 东海西湖凹陷油气地质条件及其勘探潜力[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(4):111-116.YE Jiaren, GU Huirong, JIA Jianyi.Petroleum geological condition and exploration potential of Xihu depression, East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2008,28(4):111-116. |
[14] | 张先平,陈海红,张树林, 等. 东海西湖凹陷温压系统与油气成藏[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(2):87-91.ZHANG Xianping, CHEN Haihong, ZHANG Shulin, et al.Geotemperature-pressure systems and related reservoir formation in the Xihu sag, East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2008,28(2):87-91. |
[15] | 陈琳琳,向昱. 西湖凹陷油气成藏史分析[J]. 海洋石油,2009,29(3):1-6.CHEN Linlin, XIANG Yu.Play evolution analysis of Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2009,29(3):1-6. |
[16] | 胡望水,柴浩栋,李瑞升,等. 平衡剖面技术对东海西湖凹陷正反转构造及其成藏控制的研究[J]. 特种油气藏,2010,17(1):15-19.HU Wangshui, CHAI Haodong, LI Ruisheng, et al.Application of balanced section technique to the study of positive inversion structure and hydrocarbon accumulation control in Xihu Depression of East China Sea[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2010,17(1):15-19. |
[17] | 胡望水,蔡峰,胡芳,等. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带裂陷期变换构造特征及其演化规律[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2010,32(3):7-12.HU Wangshui, CAI Feng, HU Fang, et al.Transformation structural characteristics and evolution law of Pinghu slope belt in Xihu Sag, East China Sea during rifting stage[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(J. JPI),2010,32(3):7-12. |
[18] | 李旭红. 利用气测录井资料识别储层流体的研究与应用:以涠西南凹陷探井为例[J]. 西部探矿工程,2013,25(1):89-93.LI Xuhong.Research and application of identifying reservoir fluid using gas logging data: Taking the exploration well in Wexinan Sag as an example[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering,2013,25(1):89-93. |
[19] | 陈真,王志超,符强,等. 基于地化色谱技术的3H法创新研究与应用[J]. 录井工程,2020,31(3):14-17.CHEN Zhen, WANG Zhichao, FU Qiang, et al.Innovative research and application of 3H method based on geochemical chromatography[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(3):14-17. |
[20] | 芦城,杨亚娟. 气测录井影响因素分析[J]. 青海石油,2010,28(1):99-103.LU Cheng, YANG Yajuan.Analysis of influencing factors of gas logging[J]. Qinghai Petroleum, 2010, 28(1):99-103. |
[21] | 鲁法伟,陈忠云,王建平,等. 西湖凹陷油气录井技术识别与评价[J]. 海洋石油,2012,32(1):79-82,96.LU Fawei, CHEN Zhongyun, WANG Jianping, et al.Logging evaluation of oil and gas reservoir in Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2012, 32(1):79-82,96. |
[1] | 隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75. |
[2] | 景社, 蔡军, 王雷, 兰晶晶, 袁胜斌. 油基钻井液条件下气测衍生参数法的构建与在流体判识中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 54-60. |
[3] | 妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111. |
[4] | 刘永华, 倪朋勃, 黄小刚. 录井资料在西湖凹陷始新统平湖组气层评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 49-54. |
[5] | 朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66. |
[6] | 刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83. |
[7] | 滕飞启, 衣德强, 王嘉鑫, 吴明松, 贾连超, 李永胜. 基于气测衍生参数的储层含气性评价方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 42-45. |
[8] | 王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎. 基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 46-51. |
[9] | 吴佳, 陈灿珠, 殷文荣, 孔越, 孙颖, 何成山. 气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 69-72. |
[10] | 李伟, 杨鹏波, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 刘涛, 焦艳爽. 多种录井技术在彭阳区块特殊油气藏评价中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 79-83. |
[11] | 郑周俊, 李东衡, 张良, 吴振亚, 谢平, 孔轶. 气动自升降脱气器的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 105-108. |
[12] | 王超, 周伟军, 张方贵, 彭立才, 贺震. 新疆玛湖凹陷区气测解释方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 63-68. |
[13] | 彭泽阳, 张永贵, 龙胜祥, 卢婷, 王濡岳. 基于气测全烃影响机理的气测全烃修正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 17-21. |
[14] | 宋明会. 鄂尔多斯盆地彭阳地区长3储集层气测录井解释评价方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 80-85. |
[15] | 武志超, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 李晨, 于铁, 郭鹏. 自平衡式脱气器的研发与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 104-108. |
|