录井工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 46-50.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2022.01.007

• 工艺技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

西湖凹陷低孔低渗储层气测录井识别技术

刘春锋, 熊志武, 周平   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-22 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-08
  • 作者简介:刘春锋,工程师,1989年生,2014年毕业于中国石油大学(北京)矿产普查与勘探专业,现在中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司从事油气勘探工作。通信地址:200335 上海市长宁区通协路388号中海油大厦A615。电话:(021)22830603。E-mail:liuchf15@cnooc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油(中国)有限公司科研项目“西湖凹陷西部地区勘探开发关键技术研究”(编号:CNOOC-KJ135ZDXM39SH01)

Gas logging identification technology of low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in Xihu sag

LIU Chunfeng, XIONG Zhiwu, ZHOU Ping   

  1. Shanghai Branch of CNOOC China Limited, Shanghai 200335, China
  • Received:2022-01-22 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-08

摘要: 西湖凹陷平湖组和花岗组油气层多为凝析气或轻质油层,埋藏普遍偏深、储层物性差,且具有流动性强、极易挥发的特点,由于传统的油气层识别技术所考虑的参数均比较单一,识别效果较差,故应用统计学中判别分析方法,对西湖凹陷低孔低渗油气层进行识别。此方法同时采用5个气测敏感参数作为不同油气层性质的判别参数,建立油气层综合判别函数进行流体性质判别。通过东海西湖凹陷低孔低渗油气层的判别效果来看,油气层识别符合率较传统识别方法显著提高,有效克服了传统储层识别方法的局限性,提高了录井工作效率和识别准确性。

关键词: 西湖凹陷, 气测录井, 判别分析, 判别函数

Abstract: Because the parameters considered by the traditional hydrocarbon reservoir identification technology are relatively single, the identification effect is poor, so the discriminant analysis method in statistics is used to identify low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in Xihu sag. In this method, five gas logging sensitive parameters are adopted as the discriminant parameters of different hydrocarbon reservoir properties, and the comprehensive discriminant function of hydrocarbon reservoir is established to discriminate fluid properties. Judging from the discriminant effect of low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in Xihu sag, East China Sea, the coincidence rate of hydrocarbon reservoir identification is significantly higher than that of the traditional identification methods, which effectively overcomes the limitations of the traditional reservoir identification methods and improves mud logging work efficiency and identification accuracy.

Key words: Xihu sag, gas logging, discriminant analysis, discriminant function

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 李娜,何小菊,高秀丽,等. 低孔低渗储集层测井评价技术综述与展望[J]. 国外测井技术,2013(3):8-11.LI Na, HE Xiaoju, GAO Xiuli, et al.Overview and prospect of the logging evaluation technology on low porosity and permeability reservoirs[J]. World Well Logging Technology,2013(3):8-11.
[2] 杜阳阳,王燕,李亚峰,等. 低孔低渗储层流体性质测录井综合识别方法研究现状与展望[J]. 地球物理学进展,2018,33(2):571-580.DU Yangyang, WANG Yan, LI Yafeng, et al.Research status and outlook of the mud logging and well logging data comprehensive recognition for the low porosity and permeability of the reservoir fluid properties[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2018,33(2):571-580.
[3] 陈金龙,黄志龙,董劲,等. 低渗-致密储集层地层含气量估算方法及其应用[J]. 录井工程,2019,30(4):8-12.CHEN Jinlong, HUANG Zhilong, DONG Jin, et al.Formation gas concentration estimation method of low permeability-tight reservoir and its application[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2019,30(4):8-12.
[4] 鞠传学,董春梅,张宪国,等. 西湖凹陷花港组低渗透砂岩储层孔隙结构[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2016,32(9):32-40.JU Chuanxue, DONG Chunmei, ZHANG Xianguo, et al.Study on the pore structure of low permeability reservoir of the Huagang Formation in Xihu Depression area[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2016,32(9):32-40.
[5] 黄导武,段东平,刘彬彬,等. 西湖凹陷低渗-致密砂岩气藏储层特征及差异成因[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):99-107.HUANG Daowu, DUAN Dongping, LIU Binbin, et al.Reservoir characteristics and differential genesis of low permeability-tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Xihu area sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(3):99-107.
[6] 张武,蒋一鸣,肖晓光,等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中北部花港组储层致密化过程分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2021,43(1):86-95.ZHANG Wu, JIANG Yiming, XIAO Xiaoguang, et al.Densification process of Huagang Formation in northern and central Xihu Sag of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2021,43(1):86-95.
[7] 张建培,余逸凡,张田,等. 东海西湖凹陷深盆气勘探前景探讨[J]. 中国海上油气,2013,25(2):24-29.ZHANG Jianpei, YU Yifan, ZHANG Tian, et al.A discussion on the exploration potential of deep basin gas in Xihu sag, East China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2013,25(2):24-29.
[8] 刘金水,唐健程. 西湖凹陷低渗储层微观孔隙结构与渗流特征及其地质意义:以HY构造花港组为例[J]. 中国海上油气,2013,25(2):18-23.LIU Jinshui, TANG Jiancheng.Microscopic pore texture and percolation features in the low permeability reservoirs and their geological significance in Xihu sag: A case of Huagang Formation in HY structure[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2013,25(2):18-23.
[9] 苏奥,陈红汉,陈旭,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平湖构造带致密砂岩储层成岩成藏的耦合关系[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(3):1016-1026.SU Ao, CHEN Honghan, CHEN Xu, et al.Coupling relationship between diagenetic evolution and oil and gas accumulation of tight sandstone reservoir in Pinghu structural belt in Xihu depression, Eastern Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2015,46(3):1016-1026.
[10] 庄建建,杨彩虹,颜方方. 西湖凹陷气测录井烃气指数图版的应用[J]. 海洋石油,2013,33(2):94-96.ZHUANG Jianjian, YANG Caihong, YAN Fangfang.Application of gas logging hydrocarbon index in Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2013,33(2):94-96.
[11] 王雷,蔡军,景社, 等. 西湖凹陷低渗储集层气测录井定量解释评价方法[J]. 录井工程,2020,31(3):86-89.WANG Lei, CAI Jun, JING She, et al.Quantitative interpretation and evaluation method of gas logging for low permeability reservoirs in Xihu Sag[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(3):86-89.
[12] 顾惠荣,叶加仁,郝芳. 东海西湖凹陷平湖构造带油气分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):104-108.GU Huirong, YE Jiaren, HAO Fang.Distribution pattern of oil and gas in Pinghu structural zone in Xihu depression, East China Sea[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(1):104-108.
[13] 叶加仁,顾惠荣,贾健谊. 东海西湖凹陷油气地质条件及其勘探潜力[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(4):111-116.YE Jiaren, GU Huirong, JIA Jianyi.Petroleum geological condition and exploration potential of Xihu depression, East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2008,28(4):111-116.
[14] 张先平,陈海红,张树林, 等. 东海西湖凹陷温压系统与油气成藏[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(2):87-91.ZHANG Xianping, CHEN Haihong, ZHANG Shulin, et al.Geotemperature-pressure systems and related reservoir formation in the Xihu sag, East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2008,28(2):87-91.
[15] 陈琳琳,向昱. 西湖凹陷油气成藏史分析[J]. 海洋石油,2009,29(3):1-6.CHEN Linlin, XIANG Yu.Play evolution analysis of Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2009,29(3):1-6.
[16] 胡望水,柴浩栋,李瑞升,等. 平衡剖面技术对东海西湖凹陷正反转构造及其成藏控制的研究[J]. 特种油气藏,2010,17(1):15-19.HU Wangshui, CHAI Haodong, LI Ruisheng, et al.Application of balanced section technique to the study of positive inversion structure and hydrocarbon accumulation control in Xihu Depression of East China Sea[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2010,17(1):15-19.
[17] 胡望水,蔡峰,胡芳,等. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带裂陷期变换构造特征及其演化规律[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2010,32(3):7-12.HU Wangshui, CAI Feng, HU Fang, et al.Transformation structural characteristics and evolution law of Pinghu slope belt in Xihu Sag, East China Sea during rifting stage[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(J. JPI),2010,32(3):7-12.
[18] 李旭红. 利用气测录井资料识别储层流体的研究与应用:以涠西南凹陷探井为例[J]. 西部探矿工程,2013,25(1):89-93.LI Xuhong.Research and application of identifying reservoir fluid using gas logging data: Taking the exploration well in Wexinan Sag as an example[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering,2013,25(1):89-93.
[19] 陈真,王志超,符强,等. 基于地化色谱技术的3H法创新研究与应用[J]. 录井工程,2020,31(3):14-17.CHEN Zhen, WANG Zhichao, FU Qiang, et al.Innovative research and application of 3H method based on geochemical chromatography[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(3):14-17.
[20] 芦城,杨亚娟. 气测录井影响因素分析[J]. 青海石油,2010,28(1):99-103.LU Cheng, YANG Yajuan.Analysis of influencing factors of gas logging[J]. Qinghai Petroleum, 2010, 28(1):99-103.
[21] 鲁法伟,陈忠云,王建平,等. 西湖凹陷油气录井技术识别与评价[J]. 海洋石油,2012,32(1):79-82,96.LU Fawei, CHEN Zhongyun, WANG Jianping, et al.Logging evaluation of oil and gas reservoir in Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2012, 32(1):79-82,96.
[1] 隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75.
[2] 景社, 蔡军, 王雷, 兰晶晶, 袁胜斌. 油基钻井液条件下气测衍生参数法的构建与在流体判识中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 54-60.
[3] 妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111.
[4] 刘永华, 倪朋勃, 黄小刚. 录井资料在西湖凹陷始新统平湖组气层评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 49-54.
[5] 朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66.
[6] 刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83.
[7] 滕飞启, 衣德强, 王嘉鑫, 吴明松, 贾连超, 李永胜. 基于气测衍生参数的储层含气性评价方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 42-45.
[8] 王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎. 基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 46-51.
[9] 吴佳, 陈灿珠, 殷文荣, 孔越, 孙颖, 何成山. 气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 69-72.
[10] 李伟, 杨鹏波, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 刘涛, 焦艳爽. 多种录井技术在彭阳区块特殊油气藏评价中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 79-83.
[11] 郑周俊, 李东衡, 张良, 吴振亚, 谢平, 孔轶. 气动自升降脱气器的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 105-108.
[12] 王超, 周伟军, 张方贵, 彭立才, 贺震. 新疆玛湖凹陷区气测解释方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 63-68.
[13] 彭泽阳, 张永贵, 龙胜祥, 卢婷, 王濡岳. 基于气测全烃影响机理的气测全烃修正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 17-21.
[14] 宋明会. 鄂尔多斯盆地彭阳地区长3储集层气测录井解释评价方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 80-85.
[15] 武志超, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 李晨, 于铁, 郭鹏. 自平衡式脱气器的研发与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 104-108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 芳 邹筱春 冯艳丽 王 芹. 核磁共振录井含油饱和度的测量与校正[J]. 录井工程, 2009, 20(01): 11 -14 .
[2] 陈玉新 陶青龙 李怀玉 刘兴杰 石桂栋. DML综合录井仪快速色谱分析系统[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(01): 60 -62 .
[3] 黄其贵 纪 伟 宋义民 寇红艳 黄俊莲 刘淑英 钟李明. 快速钻井条件下气测全烃曲线的归位及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(01): 42 -45 .
[4] 王 飞 龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾油田低孔低渗油藏油气水层快速评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(01): 25 -31 .
[5] 高岩① 陈亚西② 张良伟② 刘志国③. 一种基于无线传感局域网络的钻井多参数监测系统的现场应用[J]. 录井工程, 2007, 18(02): 54 -59 .
[6] 郑应钊 宫 晓 刘明波 邓 南 赵富波 . 钻具振动录井技术在苏丹钻井工程中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(01): 17 -19 .
[7] 梁晓东 丁娱娇 林学春 王东林 杜文军. 测井资料在羊三木油田水淹层综合评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(03): 65 -70 .
[8] 刘少英 史原鹏 纪 伟 郑 铂 冯曰全 李 艳 庞卫东 李拥军 . 阿尔凹陷扇三角洲储集岩差异性分析[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(03): 56 -61 .
[9] 徐凤玲 林 楠 杨锦舟 高学然. 随钻方位电磁波电阻率未钻地层预测技术[J]. 录井工程, 2011, 22(02): 14 -17 .
[10] 沈建波 高秀娥 石元会 黄强 石文睿 . 川东褶皱带海相碳酸盐岩气层产能预测[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(04): 17 -19 .