气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2022.01.012

录井工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 69-72.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2022.01.012

气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究

吴佳^①, 陈灿珠^②, 殷文荣^②, 孔越^②, 孙颖^①, 何成山^③

①中国石油渤海钻探油气合作开发分公司;
②中国石油渤海钻探第一录井公司;
③中国石油大港油田公司勘探事业部

收稿日期:2022-02-07 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-04-08
作者简介:吴佳工程师,1983年生,2012年毕业于长江大学固体地球物理学专业,硕士学位,现主要从事开发地质研究工作。通信地址:300457 天津市滨海新区第二大街83号。电话:13512930216。E-mail:wu_jia@cnpc.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油渤海钻探工程公司科研项目“气测录井响应特征与试油、压裂效果相关性研究” (编号:2016Z45K)

Study on productivity evaluation method based on the correlation between gas logging response characteristics and oil testing results

WU Jia^①, CHEN Canzhu^②, YIN Wenrong^②, KONG Yue^②, SUN Ying^①, HE Chengshan^③

①Oil & Gas Cooperation and Development Company, BHDC, CNPC, Tianjin 300457, China;
②No.1 Mud Logging Company, BHDC, CNPC, Tianjin 300280, China;
③Exploration Utility Department of PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2022-02-07 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对目前气测录井定性解释存在的不确定性,为弥补气测技术的局限,开展了气测录井响应特征与试油效果相关性研究。通过分析不同油性、不同区块、不同层位的钻井工程参数、录井参数与试油结论,引入地下单位体积岩石含气率计算方法,建立含气率产能评价公式,提出了从定性和定量结合的角度进行录井解释评价和产能预测的新方法。实际应用效果表明,该方法的解释符合率达到85%以上,应用效果良好,对油气层评价具有重要意义。

关键词: 气测录井, 试油, 定量评价, 含气率, 产能预测

Abstract: In view of the uncertainty existing in the current qualitative interpretation of gas logging, in order to make up for the limitations of gas logging technology, the correlation between gas logging response characteristics and oil testing effect is studied. Based on the analysis of drilling engineering parameters, mud logging parameters and oil testing conclusions of different oil properties, different blocks and different horizons, the calculation method of void fraction per unit volume of underground rock is introduced to establish void fraction productivity evaluation formula, and a new method of mud logging interpretation and evaluation and productivity prediction from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative combination is put forward. The applied effect shows that the interpretation coincidence rate of this method is more than 85%, and the application effect is good, which is of great significance to hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation.

Key words: gas logging, oil testing, quantitative evaluation, void fraction, productivity prediction

中图分类号:

TE132.1

吴佳, 陈灿珠, 殷文荣, 孔越, 孙颖, 何成山. 气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 69-72.

WU Jia, CHEN Canzhu, YIN Wenrong, KONG Yue, SUN Ying, HE Chengshan. Study on productivity evaluation method based on the correlation between gas logging response characteristics and oil testing results[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2022, 33(1): 69-72.

参考文献 7

[1]	王雷,郭书生,杨红君,等.INFACT气测录井解释方法在北部湾盆地的应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2012,24(6):20-24.WANG Lei, GUO Shusheng, YANG Hongjun, et al.An application of INFACT gas-logging interpretation in Beibuwan basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2012,24(6):20-24.
[2]	郑新卫,刘喆,卿华,等.气测录井影响因素及校正[J]. 录井工程,2012,23(3):20-24.ZHENG Xinwei, LIU Zhe, QING Hua, et al.Influence factors and correction of gas logging[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2012,23(3):20-24.
[3]	王立东,罗平.气测录井定量解释方法探讨[J]. 录井工程,2001,12(3):1-10.WANG Lidong, LUO Ping.A discussion on quantitative interpretation method of gas logging[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2001,12(3):1-10.
[4]	毛志强,李进福.油气层产能预测方法及模型[J]. 石油学报,2000,21(5):58-61.MAO Zhiqiang, LI Jinfu.Method and models for productivity prediction of hydrocarbon reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2000,21(5):58-61.
[5]	庞玉龙,宋子齐,何羽飞,等.基于超低渗透砂岩储层试油产能预测分析方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2013,35(5):74-78.PANG Yulong, SONG Ziqi, HE Yufei, et al.Study on the testing productivity prediction method in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2013,35(5):74-78.
[6]	陈现军,郭书生,黄浩,等.基于地下单位体积岩石含气率的录井解释方法研究[J]. 录井工程,2016,27(2):52-56.CHEN Xianjun, GUO Shusheng, HUANG Hao, et al.Study on mud logging interpretation method based on void fraction of underground rock per unit volume[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2016,27(2):52-56.
[7]	姚冰. 储层产液性质的轻烃识别方法[J]. 中外能源,2010,15(9):72-75.YAO Bing.Light hydrocarbon identification method for fluid properties in reservoir[J]. Sino-Global Energy,2010,15(9):72-75.

相关文章 15

[1]	隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75.
[2]	景社, 蔡军, 王雷, 兰晶晶, 袁胜斌. 油基钻井液条件下气测衍生参数法的构建与在流体判识中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 54-60.
[3]	妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111.
[4]	赵全国, 孙皓, 邱丙静, 李婧, 李国良, 房金伟. 苏里格气田气井分层产能贡献灰度评价[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 126-131.
[5]	朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66.
[6]	刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83.
[7]	滕飞启, 衣德强, 王嘉鑫, 吴明松, 贾连超, 李永胜. 基于气测衍生参数的储层含气性评价方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 42-45.
[8]	王海涛, 阎荣辉, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 田青青, 李艳霞. 基于岩石热解法的原油密度、粘度预测模型研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 18-23.
[9]	王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎. 基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 46-51.
[10]	刘春锋, 熊志武, 周平. 西湖凹陷低孔低渗储层气测录井识别技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 46-50.
[11]	李伟, 杨鹏波, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 刘涛, 焦艳爽. 多种录井技术在彭阳区块特殊油气藏评价中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 79-83.
[12]	郑周俊, 李东衡, 张良, 吴振亚, 谢平, 孔轶. 气动自升降脱气器的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 105-108.
[13]	汪芯, 胡云, 李鸿儒, 杨毅, 袁胜斌. 复杂井况条件下录井综合解释在现场试油实时决策中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 69-75.
[14]	胡凯. 基于岩石物理相的水淹层综合评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 57-62.
[15]	王超, 周伟军, 张方贵, 彭立才, 贺震. 新疆玛湖凹陷区气测解释方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 63-68.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究

Study on productivity evaluation method based on the correlation between gas logging response characteristics and oil testing results

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 7

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10