录井工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 46-51.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2022.02.009

• 解释评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用

王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎   

  1. ①中法渤海地质服务有限公司;
    ②中海石油(中国)有限公司湛江分公司;
    ③中海油能源发展股份有限公司湛江分公司
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-05 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-11
  • 作者简介:王瑞科 初级工程师,1981年生,2003年本科毕业于中国石油大学(华东)资勘查工程专业,2008年硕士研究生毕业于中国石油大学(北京)矿产普查与勘探专业,现在中法渤海地质服务有限公司从事录井综合解释工作。通信地址:524057 广东省湛江市坡头区南油5区物业楼2楼中法地质服务有限公司。电话:18934220750。E-mail:wangrk@cfbgc.com

Application of rapid identification and evaluation technology of complex reservoir fluid based on gas logging data in Wenchang X area

WANG Ruike, CHEN Pei, AN Dongling, HU Ke, MO Guoyan   

  1. ①China-France Bohai Geoservices Co., Ltd., Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524057,China;
    ②Zhanjiang Branch of CNOOC(China) Co., Ltd., Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524057,China;
    ③Zhanjiang Branch of CNOOC Ener Tech-Drilling &Production Co.,Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524057,China
  • Received:2022-05-05 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-11

摘要: 复杂流体油气藏的流体性质依靠常规录井、测井手段难以识别,基于文昌X区油气藏的气测录井响应,提出一种先识别流体类型、再评价含油气丰度的快速识别技术。应用目标区23口井458层显示层的气测衍生资料建立3H解释模型、Bar图法及气测衍生参数散点图等复杂储层流体性质识别图板,达到快速识别流体类型的目的;应用气测数据,分组段统计气测特征参数异常倍数和VOLC1,建立储层含油气丰度评价标准。该技术在文昌X区应用效果良好,与电缆取样、地层DST测试的吻合率达96 %以上,值得推广应用。

关键词: 气测录井, 复杂储层流体, 评价, 3H解释模型, Bar图法, 气测衍生参数, 散点图, 文昌凹陷

Abstract: The fluid properties of complex fluid hydrocarbon reservoirs are difficult to be identified by conventional mud logging and logging methods. Based on gas logging response of hydrocarbon reservoirs in Wenchang X area, a rapid identification technique is proposed to identify the fluid type first and then evaluate the hydrocarbon abundance. The gas logging derived data of 458 show layers of 23 wells in the target area were used to establish complex reservoir fluid property identification charts of 3H interpretation model, Bar diagram and gas logging derived parameter scatter diagram, so as to identify the fluid types of complex reservoirs quickly. Using gas logging data, the abnormal multiples of gas logging characteristic parameters and VOLC1 are counted by formations and members, and the evaluation criteria of reservoir hydrocarbon abundance were established. This technology has good applied effects in Wenchang X area, and the coincidence rate with cable sampling and formation DST is more than 96%, which is worth popularizing.

Key words: gas logging, complex reservoir fluid, evaluation, 3H interpretation model, Bar diagram, gas logging derived parameter, scatter diagram, Wenchang sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE 132.1
[1] 朱伟林,黎明碧,吴培康.珠江口盆地珠三坳陷石油体系[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1997,24(6):21-26.ZHU Weilin, LI Mingbi, WU Peikang.Petroleum system in Zhu Ⅲ depression of Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1997,24(6):21-26.
[2] 甘军,张迎朝,邓勇,等.珠江口盆地西部文昌A 凹陷古近系天然气富集主控因素与勘探方向[J]. 中国海上油气,2009,21(6):367-371.GAN Jun, ZHANG Yingzhao, DENG Yong,et al. Main controls over Palaeogene natural gas accumulation and its exploration direction in Wenchang A sag, the western Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2009,21(6):367-371.
[3] 徐新德,黄保家,李里,等.珠三坳陷琼海凸起油气运聚研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2000,27(4):41-44.XU Xinde,HUANG Baojia, LI Li, et al. A study on the migration and accumulation of oil and gas in Qionghai uplift, Zhusan depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development 2000,27(4):41-44.
[4] 张迎朝.珠江口盆地西部南断裂带油气成藏特征与成藏模式[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2012,47(5):786-794. ZHANG Yingzhao. Hydrocarbon pooling characteristics and pooling patterns in the south fault belt, West Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2012,47(5):786-794.
[5] 李绪深,甘军,张迎朝,等.南海西部海域断陷湖盆油气聚集规律及勘探前景[J]. 中国海上油气,2015,27(4):22-29.LI Xushen, GAN Jun, ZHANG Yingzhao, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation regularity and exploration prospects of fault lacustrine basins in western South China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2015,27(4): 22-29.
[6] 谢玉洪.珠江口盆地西部新近系海相低阻轻质油田的发现[J]. 中国工程科学,2011,13(5):16-22.XIE Yuhong. The new finding of Neogene marine low resistivity light oil field in the western part of Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Strategic Study of CAE,2011,13(5): 16-22.
[7] 程鹏,张迎朝,肖贤明,等. 琼海凸起不同电阻率油藏原油特征及成藏过程[J]. 新疆石油地质,2013,34(4):398-401.CHENG Peng, ZHANG Yingzhao, XIAO Xianming, et al. Differences of crude oil in low and high resistivity reservoirs and processes of reservoir forming in Qionghai swell in western Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2013,34(4):398-401.
[8] 陈继发.气测录井资料在文72断块区的应用及评价[J]. 断块油气田,1995,2(1):5-9.CHEN Jifa. The application and judgment of gas logging information in Block Wen-72[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,1995,2(1):5-9.
[9] 刘娟霞,王昕,吴昊晟,等.凝析气与轻质油的气测识别方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏,2017,24(5):48-53.LIU Juanxia, WANG Xin, WU Haosheng,et al. Identification method for condensate gas and light oil by gas logging and its application[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2017,24(5):48-53.
[10] 魏峰,李跃林.基于测录井资料的复杂流体性质识别技术[J]. 断块油气田,2020,27(6):760-765.WEI Feng, LI Yuelin. Identification technology of complex fluid properties based on logging and mud logging data [J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2020,27(6):760-765.
[11] 周建忠,刘雪申,曹志君.轻质油层识别评价技术在大庆长垣西部中浅层的应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(增刊1):51-52.ZHOU Jianzhong, LIU Xueshen, CAO Zhijun. Application of light oil reservoir identification and evaluation technology in middle and shallow reservoirs in western Daqing Placanticline[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2005,24(S1): 51-52.
[12] 胡云,刘宝生,汪芯,等.基于气测烃组分的储层流体相快速识别评价方法——以渤中19-6构造为例[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2018,40(增刊):44-47.HU Yun, LIU Baosheng, WANG Xin, et al. Rapid identification and evaluation method of fluid phase in reservoir based on hydrocarbon component by gas logging: Case study of Bozhong 19-6 structure[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2018,40(S1):44-47.
[13] 黄小刚.气测录井甲烷校正法与气测解释方法选择原则[J]. 录井工程,2007,18(4) :1-5.HUANG Xiaogang. Gas logging methane correction method and selection principle of gas logging interpretation method[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2007,18(4):1-5.
[14] 王雷,郭书生,杨红君,等.INFACT 气测录井解释方法在北部湾盆地的应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2012,24(6) :20-24.WANG Lei, GUO Shusheng, YANG Hongjun, et al. An application of INFACT gas-logging interpretation in Beibuwan basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2012,24(6):20-24.
[1] 熊亭, 邓卓峰, 曹英权. 潜山缝洞型储层随钻快速评价方法——以珠江口盆地惠州26-6构造为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 60-67.
[2] 方锡贤. 基于录井资料的页岩油储层评价参数探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 1-8.
[3] 邓津辉, 刘广明, 谭忠健. 基于模糊数学层次分析的井漏地质风险分级定量评价研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 40-46.
[4] 隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75.
[5] 汪磊. 微钻时录井技术在冀东油田的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 9-17.
[6] 贾然. 苏里格气田苏39区块下石盒子组盒8段储层综合评价[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 76-82.
[7] 刘林鑫, 杜贵超. 扫描电镜法在石油储层评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 47-53.
[8] 妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111.
[9] 付基友, 罗宏斌, 陈乃志, 张智慧, 张立明, 魏世亮. 火成岩储层水平井随钻录井综合评价技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 35-40.
[10] 张文雅, 胡洋, 张玉新, 孙红华, 邓清. 饶阳凹陷页岩油烃源岩及“甜点区”的录井评价研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 61-68.
[11] 景社, 蔡军, 王雷, 兰晶晶, 袁胜斌. 油基钻井液条件下气测衍生参数法的构建与在流体判识中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 54-60.
[12] 朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66.
[13] 刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83.
[14] 张文雅, 张春阳, 刘治恒, 朱更更, 胡洋, 李楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区太原组铝土岩储层录井评价[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 41-48.
[15] 赵全国, 孙皓, 邱丙静, 李婧, 李国良, 房金伟. 苏里格气田气井分层产能贡献灰度评价[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 126-131.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶国强 佘明军 李油建 严国平 李胜利 王明祥 孙少华. SLA-1型光谱录井分析仪的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 47 -51 .
[2] 王 飞 龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾油田低孔低渗油藏油气水层快速评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(01): 25 -31 .
[3] 吕 鹏 福. 对后效录井深度归位的改进[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(01): 70 -71 .
[4] 方锡贤 刘之洋 周宏杰 李红克 李幸来 . 泌阳凹陷浅层稠油水淹层识别方法研究与实践[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(01): 32 -35 .
[5] 邓明霞① 汤彬② 吴宝军③ 李朝晖③ 林丽③. 岩屑图像采集影响因素及图像采集标准[J]. 录井工程, 2007, 18(02): 17 -19 .
[6] 滕工生 张静 王洪伟 鞠虹 陈丽艳 . 吉林探区混柴油钻井液引起气测全烃异常原因及识别方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(03): 34 -36 .
[7] 李 振 江. 气测仪标定准确性的影响因素探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(03): 28 -30 .
[8] 韩性礼 李荣. 基于防爆红外烃传感器的便携式快速录井仪研发[J]. 录井工程, 2007, 18(04): 33 -35 .
[9] 马英杰 姜 勇 王秋成 张国芳 徐嘉海 白志兵. PES地层压力随钻检测评价系统及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(04): 5 -9 .
[10] 徐进宾 凌国春 郝涛. 钻井液定量荧光录井技术的研究和应用[J]. 录井工程, 2008, 19(04): 21 -25 .