录井工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 54-60.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2022.04.010
景社①, 蔡军②, 王雷②, 兰晶晶①, 袁胜斌①
JING She①, CAI Jun②, WANG Lei②, LAN Jingjing①, YUAN Shengbin①
摘要: 西湖凹陷储层烃类流体以轻质油和凝析气为主,但是受油基钻井液体系和储层本身特性的影响,传统的气测解释方法和图板在储层流体解释评价中具有局限性。为解决这一难题,对西湖凹陷已钻探井的气测数据进行统计分析,通过改进传统3H比值法,建立了GO-I油气指数解释模型,并利用交会面积对流体密度进行预测。研究结果表明,油基钻井液条件下的GO-I油气指数解释模型及交会面积预测流体密度模型得到的结果与电缆测试结论相吻合,实现了井场流体性质、油气密度的随钻快速识别。该方法分析方便快捷,解决了油基钻井液条件下储层流体判识难的问题,具有较好的效果和应用前景,可为后期地质作业决策及油气藏评价提供技术支撑。
中图分类号:
[1] 周心怀. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J].中国海上油气,2020,32(1):1-12. ZHOU Xinhuai.Geological understanding and innovation in Xihu sag and breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020,32(1):1-12. [2] 熊斌辉,王春红,张锦伟,等.西湖凹陷龙井运动特征[J].中国海上油气,2008,20(2):77-81. XIONG Binhui, WANG Chunhong, ZHANG Jinwei, et al.Longjing movement characteristics in Xihu sag[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2008,20(2):77-81. [3] 胡望水,柴浩栋,李瑞升,等.平衡剖面技术对东海西湖凹陷正反转构造及其成藏控制的研究[J].特种油气藏,2010,17(1):15-19. HU Wangshui, CHAI Haodong, LI Ruisheng, et al.Application of balanced section technique to the study of positive inversion structure and hydrocarbon accumulation control in Xihu Depression of East China Sea[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2010,17(1):15-19. [4] 顾惠荣,叶加仁,郝芳.东海西湖凹陷平湖构造带油气分布规律[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):104-108. GU Huirong, YE Jiaren, HAO Fang.Distribution pattern of oil and gas in Pinghu structural zone in Xihu depression, East China Sea[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(1):104-108. [5] 朱胜. 油基钻井液体系在东海气田的试验应用[J].钻井液与完井液,2017,34(1):77-82. ZHU Sheng.Application of oil base drilling fluids in Donghai gas field[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2017,34(1):77-82. [6] 谢华,张伟国,严海源.高动塑比油基钻井液体系研究及应用[J].石油天然气学报,2014,36(10):137-140. XIE Hua, ZHANG Weiguo, YAN Haiyuan.Research and application of high dynami-plastic ratio oil-based drilling fluid[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2014,36(10):137-140. [7] 周建立,谢俊.油基钻井液对气测值的影响与校正处理[J].录井工程,2014,25(2):22-26. ZHOU Jianli, XIE Jun.Impacts of oil-based drilling fluids on gas logging data and its correction[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2014,25(2):22-26. [8] 周建忠,刘雪申,曹志君.轻质油层识别评价技术在大庆长垣西部中浅层的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(增刊1):51-52. ZHOU Jianzhong, LIU Xueshen, CAO Zhijun.Applicating of light oil reservoir identification and evalution in medium and shallow reservoirs in western Daqing Placanticline[J].Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,2005,24(S1):51-52. [9] 顾惠荣,贾健谊,叶加仁.东海西湖凹陷含油气系统特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(3):295-306. GU Huirong, JIA Jianyi, YE Jiaren.Characteristics of oil and gas bearing system in Xihu Lake depressing in the East China Sea[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2002,23(3):295-306. [10] 徐向阳. 新疆塔北低阻油气层录井识别方法[J].海洋地质动态,2009,25(5):33-36. XU Xiangyang.Mud logging identification method for low-resistivity oil and gas reservoirs in Tabei of Xinjiang[J].Marine Geology Letters,2009,25(5):33-36. [11] 尚锁贵. 气测录井影响因素分析及甲烷校正值的应用[J].录井工程,2008,19(4):42-45,53. SHANG Suogui.The analysis of gas logging influence factor and the application of methane corrected value[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2008,19(4):42-45,53. [12] 刘应忠,吕文起,张宏艳,等.气测录井在辽河油区特种油气藏中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(4):14-16. LIU Yingzhong, LYU Wenqi, ZHANG Hongyan, et al.Applicating of gas logging in Liaohe special oil and gas reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reserviors,2003,10(4):14-16. [13] 谭忠健,吴立伟,郭明宇,等.基于烃组分分析的渤海油田录井储层流体性质解释新方法[J].中国海上油气,2016,8(3):37-43. TAN Zhongjian, WU Liwei, GUO Mingyu, et al.A new method of mud logging reservoir fluid property interpretation in Bohai oilfields based on hydrocarbon components analysis[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2016,28(3):37-43. [14] 杨思通,孙建孟,马建海,等.低孔低渗储层测录井资料油气识别方法[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(3):407-412. YANG Sitong,SUN Jianmeng, MA Jianhai, et al.Identification of hydrocarbons in low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs by integration of surface log data with wire log information[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2007, 28(3):407-412. [15] 王志战. 录井基础理论体系的形成与发展[J].录井工程,2014,25(1):1-5. WANG Zhizhan.Formation and development of mud logging basic theory system[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2014,25(1):1-5. [16] 张野,郎东升,耿长喜,等.大庆探区复杂油气水层录井综合识别与评价新技术[J].中国石油勘探,2004,43(4):43-48. ZHANG Ye, LANG Dongsheng,GENG Changxi,et al.New log technology for identification and assessment of complicated oil, gas and water layers in Daqing exploration area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2004,43(4):43-48. [17] 邢志哲,陈宏民,冯蓓华,等.气测解释新方法探讨[J].青海石油,2010,28(1):92-98. XING Zhizhe, CHEN Hongmin, FENG Beihua, et al.Discussion on new gas logging interpretation methods[J].Qinghai Petroleum,2010,28(1):92-98. [18] 胡云,谭忠健,张建斌.气相烃类衍生参数解构法及其在渤海油田的应用[J].中国海上油气,2017,29(5):62-68. HU Yun, TAN Zhongjian, ZHANG Jianbin.Decomposition of derived parameters from gaseous hydrocarbon and its application in Bohai oilfield[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2017, 29(5):62-68. |
[1] | 隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75. |
[2] | 徐哲, 倪有利, 王宇, 杜鹏, 吐洪江, 李晗. 油基钻井液条件下页岩油储层岩石热解参数校正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 41-46. |
[3] | 妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111. |
[4] | 刘永华, 倪朋勃, 黄小刚. 录井资料在西湖凹陷始新统平湖组气层评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 49-54. |
[5] | 朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66. |
[6] | 刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83. |
[7] | 滕飞启, 衣德强, 王嘉鑫, 吴明松, 贾连超, 李永胜. 基于气测衍生参数的储层含气性评价方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 42-45. |
[8] | 王俊, 杨世亮, 张丽艳, 肖光武, 张艳茹, 李菁. 古龙页岩油储层岩石热解参数S1值校正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 1-7. |
[9] | 王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎. 基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 46-51. |
[10] | 刘春锋, 熊志武, 周平. 西湖凹陷低孔低渗储层气测录井识别技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 46-50. |
[11] | 方锡贤, 狄海公, 杨凡. 泌阳凹陷B 453探井压裂试油结果与解释结论矛盾的分析与启示[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 11-17. |
[12] | 李怀军, 罗宏斌, 郁莹, 徐永华, 肖胜, 方剑. 准噶尔盆地南缘区块油基钻井液条件下录井技术的选取[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 38-45. |
[13] | 吴佳, 陈灿珠, 殷文荣, 孔越, 孙颖, 何成山. 气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 69-72. |
[14] | 宋昀轩, 王雷, 蔡军, 鲁法伟. 地化录井技术在油基钻井液环境下储层流体性质识别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 66-72. |
[15] | 李伟, 杨鹏波, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 刘涛, 焦艳爽. 多种录井技术在彭阳区块特殊油气藏评价中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 79-83. |
|