录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 99-106.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.01.016

• 地质研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海BZ油田沙河街组低渗储层成岩作用及演化特征

金宝强, 陈建波, 邓猛, 缪飞飞, 舒晓   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司渤海石油研究院
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-25 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-04-14
  • 作者简介:金宝强 高级工程师,1979年生,2006年毕业于成都理工大学矿产普查与勘探专业,硕士学位,现在中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司渤海石油研究院主要从事油气地质综合研究相关工作。通信地址:300459 天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油管理局。电话:(022)66500988。E-mail:jinbq@cnooc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国海洋石油总公司重大专项“渤海典型低孔低渗油藏勘探开发关键技术研究与实践”(编号:CNOOC-KJ125ZDXM07LTDTJ02)

Diagenesis and evolutionary characteristics of the low permeability reservoirs of the Shahejie Formation in BZ oilfield,Bohai sea

JIN Baoqiang, CHEN Jianbo, DENG Meng, MIAO Feifei, SHU Xiao   

  1. Bohai Petroleum Research Institute of CNOOC China Limited,Tianjin Branch,Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2022-12-25 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-04-14

摘要: 为解决渤海BZ油田沙河街组低渗油藏储层成因机理不明确及成岩作用定量化表征难的问题,利用岩心、岩石铸体薄片及扫描电镜等分析资料,对该油田沙河街组岩石学特征、储集空间、成岩作用、演化特征、演化阶段的定量表征进行了研究。结果表明:沙河街组储层岩石类型以岩屑长石砂岩为主,其中沙二段储层粒度分选、颗粒接触关系和储集空间类型均优于沙三段;沉积过程中主要发育机械压实及压溶、胶结和溶蚀等成岩作用,整体处于中成岩阶段A 2亚期,局部区域达到中成岩阶段B亚期;孔隙度演化分析表明,机械压实作用是沙河街组储层低渗的主要成因,在储层孔隙度损失过程中作用最大,其中沙三段相比沙二段机械压实作用更加明显,胶结和溶蚀作用对储层孔隙度损失和增加的影响基本相当。

关键词: 岩石学特征, 成岩作用, 机械压实作用, 成岩序列, 演化特征, 孔隙度演化

Abstract: In order to solve the problems of unclear formation mechanism and difficuly in quantitative characterization of diagenesis of low permeability reservoirs in Shahejie Formation in Bohai BZ oilfield, the analysis data of core, rock casting sheet and scanning electron microscope are used to study the petrological characteristics, reservoir space diagenesis and evolutionary characteristics and stages of the Shahejie Formation. The results show that the rock types of Shahejie Formation reservoirs are dominated by lithic feldspar sandstone. Reservoir grain-size sorting, particle contact relationship and reservoir space type of Es2 is better than the Es3; during the deposition process, the main diageneses such as mechanical compaction, pressure solution, cementation and dissolution are developed in A 2 substage of mesodiagenesis stage on the whole, and some local area reaches B substage of mesodiagenesis stage. The analysis of porosity evolution shows that mechanical compaction is the main cause of the low permeability for reservoirs of the Shahejie Formation. It plays an absolute destructive role in the process of reservoir porosity loss. Compared with Es2, mechanical compaction of Es3 is more obvious. The impact of cementation and dissolution reservoir porosity loss and increase is basically the same.

Key words: petrological characteristics, diagenesis, mechanical compaction, diagenetic sequence, evolutionary characteristics, porosity evolution

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 邓猛,赵军寿,金宝强,等.基于古地貌分析的中深层沉积储层质量评价——以渤海X油田沙二段为例[J].断块油气田,2019,26(2):147-152.
DENG Meng,ZHAO Junshou,JIN Baoqiang,et al.Reservoir quality evolution of middle-deep formations based on paleo-geomorphology analysis: A case study of Sha-2 Formation in X oilfield of Bohai Bay, China[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2019,26(2):147-152.
[2] 孟昊,钟大康,李超,等.渤海湾盆地渤中坳陷渤中25-1油田古近系沙河街组沙二段沉积相及演化[J].古地理学报,2016,18(2):161-172.
MENG Hao,ZHONG Dakang,LI Chao,et al.Sedimentary facies and evolution of the Member 2 of Paleogene Shahejie Formation of BZ25-1 oilfield in Bozhong depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2016,18(2):162-171.
[3] 周军良,胡勇,李超,等. 渤海典型低孔低渗油藏储层预测及效果:以渤海A油田沙河街组二段为例[J].海相油气地质,2016,21(4):73-77.
ZHOU Junliang,HU Yong,LI Chao,et al.Reservoir prediction and result of classical Eocene Shahejie-2 reservoir with low porosity and low permeability in oilfield A,Bohaiwan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2016,21(4):73-77.
[4] 胡勇,周军良,汪全林,等. 渤海BZ油田低渗储层质量主控因素及开发实践[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(1):103-112.
HU Yong,ZHOU Junliang,WANG Quanlin,et al.The quality control factors and development practices of low permeability reservoirs in BZ oilfield,Bohai sea[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(1):103-112.
[5] 周军良,胡勇,耿红柳,等.渤海海域A油田沙二段低渗储层特征及控制因素[J].海洋地质前沿,2016,32(12):26-32.
ZHOU Junliang,HU Yong,GENG Hongliu,et al.Features and controlling factors of low permeability reservoirs of E3S2 Formation in Oilfield A,Bohai Bay[J].Marine Geology Frontiers,2016,32(12):26-32.
[6] 孙海涛,李超,钟大康,等. 渤中25-1油田沙三段低渗储层特征及其成因[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):11-16.
SUN Haitao,LI Chao,ZHONG Dakang,et al.Characteristics and origin of low permeability reservoir of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Bozhong 25-1 Oilfield[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):11-16.
[7] 王震,李敬松,刘汝敏,等.低渗透砂岩储层成因机理研究:以B油田为例[J].油气地球物理,2012,10(2):35-37.
WANG Zhen,LI Jingsong,LIU Rumin,et al.The study of low permeable genesis of sand stone reservoir:A case history of the B oilfield[J].Petroleum Geophysics,2012,10(2):35-37.
[8] 杨玉卿,潘福熙,田洪,等.渤中25-1油田沙河街组低孔低渗储层特征及分类评价[J].现代地质,2010,24(4):685-693.
YANG Yuqing,PAN Fuxi,TIAN Hong,et al.Characteristics and classification and evaluation of low porosity and permeability reservoir in Shahejie Formation of BZ 25-1 oilfield[J].Geoscience,2010,24(4):685-693.
[9] 周军良,胡勇,李超,等.渤海A油田扇三角洲相低渗储层特征及物性控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(1):71-78.
ZHOU Junliang,HU Yong,LI Chao,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of fan delta facies low permeability reservoirs in Bohai A oilfield,the Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(1):71-78.
[10] 许聘,胡勇,周军良,等.渤海湾渤中25油田沙二段低渗储层特征[J].西安科技大学学报,2017,37(4):573-581.
XU Pin, HU Yong,ZHOU Junliang,et al.Characteristics of low permeability reservoir of Sha2 Member in Bohai Bozhong 25 oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi′an University of Science and Technology,2017,37(4):573-581.
[11] 王震,李敬松,刘汝敏,等.渤中凹陷南部低渗透储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].海洋石油,2012,32(4):23-27.
WANG Zhen,LI Jingsong,LIU Rumin,et al.Diagenesis and pore evolution of low permeability reservoirs in Southern Bozhong depression[J]. Offshore Oil,2012,32(4):23-27.
[12] 吉双文. 渤海湾盆地喜马拉雅运动幕次划分及演化特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(4):38-42.
JI Shuangwen.The kinematic phase division and evolution character of Himalayan movement in Bohaiwan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2007,26(4):38-42.
[13] 项华,徐长贵.渤海海域古近系隐蔽油气藏层序地层学特征[J].石油学报,2006,27(2):11-15.
XIANG Hua,XU Changgui.Sequence stratigraphic characteristics of subtle oil-gas pool in the Paleogene of Bohai Sea area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(2):11-15.
[14] 周士科,魏泽典,邓宏文,等.渤中凹陷古近系构造层序研究[J].中国海上油气,2006,18(4):236-254.
ZHOU Shike,WEI Zedian,DENG Hongwen,et al.A study on Paleogene tectonic sequences in Bozhong sag[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2006,18(4):236-254.
[15] 胡光义,陈飞,范廷恩,等.渤海海域S油田新近系明化镇组河流相复合砂体叠置样式分析[J].沉积学报,2014,32(3):586-592.
HU Guangyi,CHEN Fei,FAN Tingen,et al.Analysis of fluvial facies compound sandbody architecture of the Neogene Minghuazhen Formation of S oilfield in the Bohai Bay[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(3):586-592.
[16] 张鹏,安山,张亮,等.罗庞塬地区延长组孔隙结构特征研究[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(1):87-90.
ZHANG Peng,AN Shan,ZHANG Liang,et al.Pore structure characteristics of Luopangyuan region in Yanchang oilfield[J].Journal of Yan′an University(Natural Science Edition ),2013,32(1):87-90.
[17] 张小莉,查明,杨懿.惠民凹陷沙河街组三段岩性油藏储层孔隙结构特征及油气意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):287-292.
ZHANG Xiaoli,ZHA Ming,YANG Yi.Pore structure features of lithologic reservoirs in the third Member of Shahejie Formation in Huimin sag and their significance in petroleum exploration[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(2):287-292.
[18] 吴陈冰洁,朱筱敏,魏巍,等.查干凹陷下白垩统巴二段储层特征及孔隙演化[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):71-80.
WU-CHEN Bingjie,ZHU Xiaomin,WEI Wei,et al.Reservoir characteristics and pore evolution of the second Member of the lower Cretaceous Bayingebi Formation in Chagan Depression[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(1):71-80.
[19] 赖锦,王贵文,柴毓,等.致密砂岩储层孔隙结构成因机理分析及定量评价:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组为例[J].地质学报,2014,88(11):2019-2030.
LAI Jin,WANG Guiwen,CHAI Yu,et al.Mechanism analysis and quantitative assessment of pore structure for tight sandstone reservoirs:An example from Chang 8 oil layer in the Jiyuan area of Odors Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(11):2119-2130.
[20] BEARD D C,WEYL P K.Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J].AAPG Bulletin,1973,57(2):349-369.
[21] 葛家旺,朱筱敏,潘荣,等.珠江口盆地惠州凹陷文昌组砂岩孔隙定量演化模式:以HZ-A地区辫状河三角洲储层为例[J].沉积学报,2015,33(1):183-193.
GE Jiawang,ZHU Xiaomin,PAN Rong,et al.A quantitative porosity evolution model of sandstone for Wenchang Formation in Huizhou Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin: A case study for braided fluvial delta reservoir of HZ-A area[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(1):183-193.
[1] 田伟志. 成岩作用对生储盖层的影响与成岩史模拟——以北部湾盆地福山凹陷为例[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(2): 115-121.
[2] 赵珺, 刘海富, 王芮, 李玲玲, 胡小龙, 侯万滨. 羊三木油田储集层非均质性特征研究[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(2): 142-147.
[3] 郭志强 仲学哲 李国旭 尹文庆 郑岩力. 南堡凹陷GB区块沙三3亚段Ⅴ油层组储集层物性特征及影响因素——以G 32-19井为例[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(01): 84-88.
[4] 汤 戈. 大港油田埕海地区沙二段碎屑岩储集性能特征及主控因素分析[J]. 录井工程, 2015, 26(04): 74-80.
[5] 吴淑琴 李俊国 苏沛强 肖 斐 郝丽萍 唐金波 . 歧口凹陷低孔低渗储集层成因探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2013, 24(01): 81-84.
[6] 何文祥 刘 逸. 港东开发区明化镇组储集层特征及其物性差异的机理探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(04): 45-48,59.
[7] 李长洪 安文武 马 红 张会芳 王 丽 薛明侠 齐丽华. 苏里格气田苏20区块天然气富集规律研究[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(03): 51-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 寇海亮 张丽艳. 北部凹陷新安村组、乌云组储集层解释评价[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 36 -39 .
[2] 孔 郁 琪. 地化录井在松辽盆地黑帝庙油层原油性质判别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 40 -43 .
[3] 韩性礼 孟 辉 王西安 袁宝清 何天清 . 国内录井装备的现状与发展建议[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 44 -46 .
[4] 王 丽. 综合录井仪色谱标定减压阀的研究[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 62 -66 .
[5] 陶国强 佘明军 李油建 严国平 李胜利 王明祥 孙少华. SLA-1型光谱录井分析仪的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 47 -51 .
[6] 程 峰 赵电波 孟祥文 刘江华 孙海波 冀建国 . 提高色谱仪全烃检测稳定性的研讨[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 67 -68 .
[7] 占 蓉 邹筱春 李 芳. 随钻X射线衍射分析录井技术应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 1 -5 .
[8] 张国田 郑新卫 王丹丹 孟祥文. X射线荧光元素录井在辽河油田的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 10 -16 .
[9] 邓 平 王丙寅 李玉勤 马 红 . 地化录井技术在永安油田致密砂岩油气层评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(04): 17 -21 .
[10] 韩国生 李双龙 张继德 支丽菊 周艳红 孟祥文. 气测录井在辽河坳陷非常规储集层解释评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(04): 24 -29 .