录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 51-56.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.02.009

• 解释评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于时间-温度拟合曲线的岩心密闭试验参数优化方法

阎荣辉, 滕飞启②,③, 满百胜, 吴明松②,③, 李俊汉   

  1. ①中国石油长庆油田分公司工程技术管理部;
    ②中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院;
    ③低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室;
    ④中国石油长庆油田分公司长北作业分公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-07 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 滕飞启 工程师,1982年生,2006年毕业于中国地质大学(北京)资源勘查工程专业,现在长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院从事测录井评价解释工作。通信地址:710018 陕西省西安市未央区凤城四路长庆油田科技楼。电话:18089204920。E-mail:tfq2_cq@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:阎荣辉 高级工程师,1975年生,2003年毕业于西南石油学院矿物与岩石学专业,现在长庆油田分公司从事工程技术管理工作。通信地址:710018 陕西省西安市未央区凤城四路长庆油田科研楼。电话:(029)86978610。E-mail:yrh_cq@petrochina.com.cn

Optimization of core airtight test parameters based on time-temperature fitting curve

YAN Ronghui, TENG Feiqi②,③, MAN Baisheng, WU Mingsong②,③, LI Junhan   

  1. ①Engineering Technology Management Department of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
    ②Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
    ③National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low Permeability Oil and Gas Fields,Xi′an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
    ④Changbei Operation Branch of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company,Yulin,Shaanxi 719000, China
  • Received:2023-04-07 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-12

摘要: 密闭试验是含气储层含水观察常用方法,但是在实际操作过程中试验温度与密闭时间没有统一标准,观察结果对比性较差,不利于岩性含水性的判断。通过试验测定在不同温度下岩心水分挥发量与时间的关系,用曲线拟合方法,优选出岩心密闭试验最佳参数组合,结果表明,在60℃条件下,密闭时间为120 min后观察袋壁附着水珠产状效果最佳。参数定量后,密闭试验的可比性显著增强,实现了从单井解释到井间对比,在油田勘探开发中具有一定的应用前景。

关键词: 岩心录井, 含水评价, 密闭试验, 拟合曲线, 挥发速率, 质量

Abstract: Sealing test is a common method to observe water content in gas-bearing reservoir, but there is no unified standard for test temperature and sealing time in actual operation, and the contrast of observation results is poor, which is not conducive to the judgment of lithology water content. By measuring the relationship between the volatilization amount of core water and time at different temperatures, the best parameter combination of core sealing test is selected by curve fitting method. The experimental results show that the water droplets which are attached to the bag wall is the best effect when the sealing time is 120 min at 60℃. After the parameters are quantified, the comparability of the sealing test is significantly enhanced, and the single well interpretation and cross well correlation are realized, which has certain application prospects in oilfield exploration and development.

Key words: core logging, water cut evaluation, sealing test, fitting curve, volatilization rate, quality

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 刘国强,朱清祥. 录井方法与原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:164-218.
LIU Guoqiang, ZHU Qingxiang.Mud logging method and principle[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011:164-218.
[2] 刘国强,刘应忠,刘岩. 录井方法与技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2017:9-27.
LIU Guoqiang, LIU Yingzhong, LIU Yan.Mud logging method and technology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2017:9-27.
[3] 胡道雄,蒲国强. 录井技术手册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2015:67-76.
HU Daoxiong, PU Guoqiang.Mud logging technical manual[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2015:67-76.
[4] 张殿强,李联玮. 地质录井方法与技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2014:30-52.
ZHANG Dianqiang, LI Lianwei.Geological logging method and technology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2014:30-52.
[5] 魏红,吴秋业. 化学实验[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2005:55-56.
WEI Hong,WU Qiuye.Chemical experiment[M]. Beijing:People's Education Press,2005:55-56.
[6] 《地质监督》编委会. 地质监督[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2019:96-112.
Geological Supervision Editorial Board. Geological supervision[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2019:96-112.
[7] 孙祖岭. 钻井地质工[M].北京:中国石油大学出版社,2003:30-52,84-89.
SUN Zuling.Drilling geologist[M]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum Press,2003:30-52,84-89.
[8] 邓玉珍,刘慧卿.低渗透岩心中油水两相渗流启动压力梯度试验[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2006,28(3):37-40.
DENG Yuzhen, LIU Huiqing. Experiment on starting pressure gradient of oil and water two phases flow in low permeability core[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2006,28(3):37-40.
[9] 王志战. 录井科学技术研究的战略定位与实施策略[J]. 录井工程,2021,32(3): 1-5.
WANG Zhizhan. Strategic positioning and implementation strategy of mud logging science and technology research[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2021,32(3):1-5.
[10] 迟元林.录井资料处理技术发展方向及对策[J].录井工程,2009,20(3):13-16.
CHI Yuanlin. Development direction and countermeasure for mud logging data processing technology[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2009,20(3):13-16.
[11] 张卫,郑春山,张新华.国外录井技术新进展及发展方向[J].录井工程, 2012,23(1):1-4,24.
ZHANG Wei, ZHENG Chunshan, ZHANG Xinhua. New progress and development direction of foreign mud logging technology[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2012,23(1):1-4,24.
[12] 刘应忠,李一超,刘振江.中国录井业务现状及发展对策[J].录井工程, 2012,23(2):1-7.
LIU Yingzhong, LI Yichao, LIU Zhenjiang. Current situation and development countermeasures of mud logging business in China[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2012,23(2):1-7.
[1] 郭琼, 赵天东, 王奎, 武刚, 王立永, 林辉. 页岩油井固井质量与录井参数相关性研究——以大港油田官东地区页岩油井为例[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 7-13.
[2] 汪芯, 胡云, 李鸿儒, 杨毅, 袁胜斌. 复杂井况条件下录井综合解释在现场试油实时决策中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 69-75.
[3] 牟连刚, 赵亮, 屈艳玲, 王娜, 周凤春, 刘绘纺. 重力流水道砂体孔隙演化特征与质量预测——以歧口凹陷歧南斜坡区沙一中亚段为例[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(S1): 86-94.
[4] 卢忠沅, 陈蓉, 黎强, 李英林, 任慧宁, 李刚, 雨松, 李特. 塔里木油田钻井工程实时数据质量管理方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(3): 118-121.
[5] 谢广龙. 岩心录井中重力流沉积的现场识别及科学分段[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(03): 144-147.
[6] 王 志 战. 2014年《录井工程》刊发论文评述[J]. 录井工程, 2015, 26(04): 81-91.
[7] 王志战 程昌茹 班晓维 魏杨旭 辛志军 . 提高录井数据质量的意义与技术途径[J]. 录井工程, 2015, 26(03): 6-8,26.
[8] 刘 海 滨. 东营凹陷沙四段膏盐岩地层卡取方法[J]. 录井工程, 2014, 25(01): 84-88.
[9] 何炳振 蔡茂佳 李万强 李晓祥. 应用录井、测井资料进行压裂设计的方法与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2013, 24(03): 33-35.
[10] 孟 祥 文. GW-MLE综合录井仪可编程智能电源控制系统[J]. 录井工程, 2013, 24(02): 74-76.
[11] 王超 田野 王嘉 阎治全 元欐 李栋巍 徐延平 . 基于CCD的光谱测量系统在定量荧光录井中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(03): 16-19,,88.
[12] 韩永刚 唐龙逊 熊驰愿 濮 瑞 李 平 陈述良 李永保. 化学-质量法碳酸盐岩定量分析技术及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2011, 22(04): 16-19.
[13] 唐 金 祥. 加强岩心录井工作及岩心资料应用的几点建议[J]. 录井工程, 2010, 21(03): 33-34,44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!