录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 129-138.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.02.021

• 地质研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

长庆油田上古生界河流相砂体叠置模式研究及其在提高水平井储层钻遇率中的应用

张雨欣, 李长洪, 沈文洁, 叶庆丽, 田旺东, 姜全达   

  1. ①中国石油渤海钻探第一录井公司;
    ②中国石油长庆油田分公司第四采油厂
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-12 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-12
  • 作者简介:张雨欣 助理工程师,1996年生,2019年毕业于长江大学资源勘查工程专业,现在中国石油渤海钻探第一录井公司从事综合地质研究工作。通信地址:300280 天津市滨海新区海滨街道团结东路8号。电话:(022)25960020。E-mail:275469299@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油渤海钻探第一录井公司项目“长庆油田上古生界河流相砂体提高气层钻遇率研究”(编号:2022LJ09Y)

Study on superimposed patterns of upper Paleozoic fluvial sand bodies and its application in improving reservoir drilling rate of horizontal wells in Changqing Oilfield

ZHANG Yuxin, LI Changhong, SHEN Wenjie, YE Qingli, TIAN Wangdong, JIANG Quanda   

  1. ①No. 1 Mud Logging Company,BHDC, CNPC, Tianjin 300280, China;
    ②No. 4 Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Yulin, Shaanxi 718500, China
  • Received:2023-02-12 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-12

摘要: 为精确分析长庆油田上古生界河流相储层单期河道砂体与隔夹层在空间上的配置关系进而提高砂体水平井储层钻遇率,将研究区域内煤层、灰岩及高成熟的古土壤层等标志层作为划分沉积单元的等时面,采用等时相控技术进行对比,并应用切片对比法和等高程对比法划分沉积单元。研究表明,长庆油田上古生界河流相砂体由两期或多期单期河道砂体叠加而成,河道内部隔层自然伽马和电阻率曲线的回返程度与隔层厚度有关,厚度越大曲线回返程度越大,曲线回返程度划分为阶梯式、半幅式及基线式,进一步总结出单期河道砂体在侧向上、垂向上的叠置模式:侧向接触关系主要分为砂体孤立型、砂体对接接触型及砂体切叠接触型;垂向接触关系主要分为砂体间歇式叠加、砂体完整式叠加、砂体侵蚀削截式叠加。通过研究单期河道砂体叠置模式,深入分析单期河道砂体与隔夹层在空间上的配置关系,指导水平井轨迹控制,从而提高有效储层钻遇率。

关键词: 河流相, 沉积单元, 单期砂体, 叠置模式, 储层钻遇率, 水平井, 长庆油田

Abstract: To accurately analyze the spatial configuration of single channel sand bodies, barriers and interbeds in upper Paleozoic fluvial reservoirs in Changqing Oilfield, and then improve the reservoir drilling rate of sand body horizontal wells, marker beds such as coal seam, limestone and high mature paleosoil layer in the study area were used as isochronous surfaces to divide sedimentation units. Isochronous facies-controlled technology was used for comparison, and slice correlation method and isobath correlation method were used to divide sedimentation units. The study shows that the upper Paleozoic fluvial sand bodies in Changqing Oilfield are formed by the superposition of two or multiple stages of single channel sand bodies. The degree of return of the natural gamma and resistivity curves of the barriers in the river channel is related to the thickness of the barriers. The larger the thickness, the greater degree of curve return. The degree of curve return can be divided into the types of stepped, half amplitude and base line. Furthermore, the superimposed patterns of single channel sand bodies in both lateral and vertical directions were summarized. The lateral contact relationships were mainly divided into sand body isolated type, sand body butt-joint contact type and sand body cutting and stacked contact type. The vertical contact relationships were mainly divided into sand body intermittent stacking, sand body complete stacking and sand body erosion truncated stacking. By studying the superimposed patterns of single channel sand bodies, in-depth analysis of the spatial configuration of single channel sand bodies, barriers and interbeds can guide the trajectory control of horizontal wells and improve effective reservoir drilling rate.

Key words: fluvial facies, sedimentation unit, single stage sand body, superimposed pattern, reservoir drilling rate, Changqing Oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 段长江,罗顺社,周彪.苏里格地区中二叠统下石盒子组盒8段沉积相研究[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2012,32(1):55-61.
DUAN Changjiang, LUO Shunshe, ZHOU Biao. Sedimentary facies in the eighth Member of the Middle Permian Lower Shihezi Formation in the Sulige region[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2012,32(1):55-61.
[2] 崔卫东.新滩油田曲流河薄层砂体对比方法研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(4):33-38.
CUI Weidong. The comparison methods of thin sandbody of meandering facies in Xintan Oilfield[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science&Technology Edition),2011,33(4):33-38.
[3] 赵翰卿.大庆油田河流-三角洲沉积的油层对比方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1988,7(4):25-31.
ZHAO Hanqing. Formation correlation of fluvial-deltaic deposition in Daqing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,1988,7(4):25-31.
[4] 魏新善,王飞雁,王怀厂,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部二叠系太原组灰岩储层特征[J].天然气工业,2005,25(4):16-18.
WEI Xinshan,WANG Feiyan,WANG Huaichang, et al. Characteristics of Taiyuan Formation limestone reservoir of Permian in east E′Erduosi Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(4):16-18.
[5] 李志鹏,林承焰,董波,等. 河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体内部建筑结构模式[J].石油学报,2012,33(1):101-105.
LI Zhipeng,LIN Chengyan,DONG Bo, et al. An internal structure model of subaqueous distributary channel sands of the fluvial-dominated delta[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012,33(1):101-105.
[6] 尹太举,张昌民,樊中海,等. 地下储层建筑结构预测模型的建立[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(3):7-14.
YIN Taiju, ZHANG Changmin, FAN Zhonghai, et al. Establishment of the prediction models of reservoir architectural elements[J]. Journal of Xi′an Petroleum Institute(Natural Science Edition),2002,17(3):7-14.
[7] 卢虎胜,林承焰,程奇,等. 东营凹陷永安镇油田沙二段三角洲相储层构型及剩余油分布[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(3):40-47.
LU Husheng, LIN Chengyan, CHENG Qi, et al. Reservoir architectures and remaining oil distribution of the delta facies of Es2 Formation in Yong′anzhen Oilfield, Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(3):40-47.
[8] 封从军,鲍志东,杨玲,等. 三角洲前缘水下分流河道储集层构型及剩余油分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):323-329.
FENG Congjun, BAO Zhidong, YANG Ling, et al. Reservoir architecture and remaining oil distribution of deltaic front underwater distributary channel[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):323-329.
[9] 文光耀,吴向红,李贤兵,等. Bongor盆地Baobab North油田浊积水道砂体构型表征9] 文光耀,吴向红,李贤兵,等.Bongor盆地Baobab North油田浊积水道砂体构型表征[J].现代地质,2017,31(3):555-564.
WEN Guangyao,WU Xianghong,LI Xianbing,et al. Turbidity channel sandstone reservoir characterization in Baobab North Oilfield,Bongor Basin[J].Geoscience,2017,31(3):555-564.
[10] 王珏,陈欢庆,周俊杰,等. 扇三角洲前缘储层构型表征——以辽河西部凹陷于楼为例[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(2):20-28.
WANG Jue, CHEN Huanqing, ZHOU Junjie,et al. Characterization of reservoir configuration in fan delta front:A case study of Yulou in Liaohe Western Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2016,35(2):20-28.
[1] 王俊, 岳红星, 秦榜伟, 罗鸿成, 龚超, 王跃昆. 吉木萨尔页岩油录井综合地质导向技术应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 47-53.
[2] 向克满, 唐诚, 王崇敬, 梁波, 凡刚. 川南D区水平井靶区小层的UMAP算法判别图板研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 18-23.
[3] 付基友, 罗宏斌, 陈乃志, 张智慧, 张立明, 魏世亮. 火成岩储层水平井随钻录井综合评价技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 35-40.
[4] 李柯, 唐诚, 王崇敬, 梁波, 施强, 欧传根. 川南页岩小微尺度断层井震结合识别方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 125-132.
[5] 赵红燕, 廖勇, 项克伟, 邹筱春, 陈辉, 石元会. 起伏型地层水平段井筒轨迹控制方法[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 117-120.
[6] 张学忠, 向晓, 张国兵, 杨凯程, 权骋, 黄万国. 数智化录井技术在长庆油田苏南区块的研发应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 1-6.
[7] 徐志, 王芳, 李丹, 张晓丹, 马浩. AS油田特低渗油藏超短水平井加密攻关与实践[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 97-102.
[8] 谷红陶, 刘江涛. 川东南平桥区块页岩气水平井地质导向关键技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 109-115.
[9] 彭业雄, 黄治梁, 李仕芳, 贾浩, 方铁园, 刘芳芳. 多种录井技术在水平井射孔井段优选中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 60-64.
[10] 吴早平, 李三明, 蒋融. 录井大数据在水平井开发区潜力评价中的应用——以大牛地气田D 8-D 10井区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 73-80.
[11] 宋明会. 地质工程一体化录井综合导向模式设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 90-93.
[12] 黄余金. 储层界面预测新方法在水平井地质导向中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 18-23.
[13] 王重云. 随钻方位伽马测井仪的设计与性能验证[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 94-98.
[14] 刘平, 施宝海, 陈贺, 李长洪, 孙方宇, 史从越. 三维地质建模技术在水平井钻井地质设计中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 121-126.
[15] 梁斌, 任瑞川, 程琦, 曾济楚, 王金友, 吴生. 水平井地质导向关键技术研究及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 37-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!