录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 139-144.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.02.022

• 地质研究 • 上一篇    

柴达木盆地干柴沟地区下干柴沟组上段烃源岩特征

张长好, 付新, 张连梁, 段宏臻, 李强, 张伟   

  1. ①中国石油青海油田分公司勘探处;
    ②中油测井青海分公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-22 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 付新 高级工程师,1984年生,2013年毕业于东北石油大学,现主要从事随钻地质研究和测录井综合解释工作。通信地址:736202 甘肃省敦煌市七里镇中油测井青海分公司。电话:18093711628。E-mail:6531458@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张长好 高级地质师,1977年生,主要从事石油勘探随钻地质研究和现场管理工作。通信地址:736202 甘肃省敦煌市七里镇青海油田勘探事业部。E-mail:zchqh@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大专项“中国陆相页岩油成藏机理、分布规律与资源潜力研究”(编号:2019E-2601)

Characteristics of source rocks in the upper Member of lower Ganchaigou Formation in Ganchaigou area, Qaidam Basin

ZHANG Changhao, FU Xin, ZHANG Lianliang, DUAN Hongzhen, LI Qiang, ZHANG Wei   

  1. ①PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, DunHuang, Gansu 736202, China;
    ②Qinghai Branch of China National Logging Corporation, Dunhuang, Gansu 736202, China
  • Received:2023-03-22 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-07-12

摘要: 为解决柴达木盆地干柴沟地区下干柴沟组上段(E32)烃源岩评价标准尚未建立、烃源岩研究程度偏低的问题,通过大量岩心化验分析进行有机岩石学、有机地球化学、正构烷烃及类异戊二烯烷烃为代表的生物标志化合物研究,对干柴沟地区下干柴沟组上段进行了烃源岩评价及母质沉积环境探讨。结果表明:依据烃源岩有机质类型、TOC、氯仿沥青“A”含量、游离烃S1指标可确定Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类烃源岩的评价标准;烃源岩有机质来源为藻类等低等水生浮游生物和微生物;有机质类型为Ⅱ1-Ⅰ型;烃源岩成熟度介于低成熟-成熟生烃阶段。该研究对确定下一步有利勘探目标具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 烃源岩, 地球化学特征, 生物标志化合物, 下干柴沟组, 干柴沟地区, 柴达木盆地

Abstract: In order to solve the problem that the evaluation standard of source rocks in the upper Member of the lower Ganchaigou Formation (E32) in Ganchaigou area of Qaidam Basin has not been established yet and the research degree of source rocks is low, the source rocks and parent material sedimentary environment of the upper Member of the lower Ganchaigou Formation in Ganchaigou area are evaluated by studying biomarkers such as organic petrology, organic geochemistry, n-alkanes and isoprene-like alkanes through a large number of core analysis. The results show that according to the organic matter type, TOC, chloroform asphalt "A" and free hydrocarbon S1 index of source rocks, the evaluation criteria of class Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ source rocks can be determined. The organic matter of source rocks comes from lower aquatic plankton and microorganisms such as algae. The type of organic matter is Ⅱ1-Ⅰ. The maturity of source rocks is between low maturity and maturity. This study has certain guiding significance for determining favorable exploration targets in the next step.

Key words: hydrocarbon source rock, geochemical characteristics, biomarkers, lower Ganchaigou Formation, Ganchaigou area, Qaidam Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 杜金虎,胡素云,庞正炼,等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):560-568.
DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):560-568.
[2] 胡素云,赵文智,侯连华,等. 中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):819-828.
HU Suyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, HOU Lianhua, et al. Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):819-828.
[3] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华,等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploratin and Development,2020,47(1):1-10.
[4] 李国欣,朱如凯.中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(2):1-13.
LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai. Progress, challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(2):1-13.
[5] 李国欣,朱如凯,张永庶,等. 柴达木盆地英雄岭页岩油地质特征、评价标准及发现意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(1):18-31.
LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai, ZHANG Yongshu, et al. Geological characteristics, evaluation criteria and discovery significance of Paleogene Yingxiongling shale oil in Qaidam Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(1):18-31.
[6] 全国石油天然气标准化技术委员会. 岩石热解分析:GB/T 18602-2012[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
National Petroleum and Natural Gas Standardization Technical Committee. Rock pyrolysis analysis: GB/T 18602-2012[S]. Beijing:Standards Press for China, 2012.
[7] 全国石油天然气标准化技术委员会. 沉积岩中总有机碳测定:GB/T 19145-2022[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2022.
National Petroleum and Natural Gas Standardization Technical Committee. Determination of total organic carbon in sedimentary rock:GB/T 19145-2022[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2022.
[8] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会. 透射光-荧光干酪根显微组分鉴定及类型划分方法:SY/T 5125-2014[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2014.
Standardization Committee for Petroleum Geological Exploration. Identification and classification of kerogen macerals by transmission light-fluorescence:SY/T 5125-2014[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2014.
[9] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会. 沉积岩中镜质体反射率测定方法:SY/T 5124-2012[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2012.
Standardization Committee for Petroleum Geological Exploration. Determination of vitrinite reflectance in sedimentary rocks: SY/T 5124-2012[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2012.
[10] 石油地质勘探专业标准化技术委员会.石油和沉积有机质烃类气相色谱分析方法:SY/T 5779-2008[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2008.
Standardization Committee for Petroleum Geological Exploration. Gas chromatographic analysis of hydrocarbons in petroleum and sedimentary organic matter: SY/T 5779-2008[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2008.
[11] 卢双舫,黄文彪,陈方文,等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):249-255.
LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:Discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):249-255.
[12] 张文雅,颜怀羽,李娟,等. 页岩油“三类、三性”录井评价方法及其在饶阳凹陷的应用[J].录井工程,2020,31(2):79-85.
ZHANG Wenya, YAN Huaiyu, LI Juan, et al. The mud logging evaluation method of three types and three properties of shale oil and its applicaiton in Raoyang Sag[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(2):79-85.
[13] 李福来,吕琳,马文宽,等. 乌石凹陷流沙港组烃源岩地球化学特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(1):31-40.
LI Fulai, LYU Lin, MA Wenkuan, et al. Geochemical characteristics of source rocks in Liushagang Formation of Wushi Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2021,45(1):31-40.
[14] POWELL T G, MCKIRDY D M. Relationship between ratio of pristine to phytane, crude oil composition and geological environment in Australia[J]. Nature Physical Science,1973,243(124):37-39.
[15] PETERS K E, WALTERS C C, MOLDOWAN J M. The Biomarker Guide:biomarkers in the environment and human history[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005:1155.
[16] HAVEN H L T, ROHMER M, RULLKÖTTER J, et al. Tetrahymanol, the most likely precursor of gammacerane, occurs ubiquitously in marine sediments[J]. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta,1989,53(11):3073-3079.
[17] 陈建渝,郝芳.有机岩石学研究有机质类型和成熟度的改进[J].石油实验地质,1990,12(4):426-431.
CHEN Jianyu, HAO Fang. Improvement on study of organic types and maturation with organic petrology[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,1990,12(4):426-431.
[18] 侯娟,曹建康,庄一鹏,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬-宜探区延长组长7烃源岩特征及评价[J].矿产与地质,2021,35(4):708-716.
HOU Juan, CAO Jiankang, ZHUANG Yipeng, et al. The evaluation and characteristic of Chang 7 hydrocarbon source rock in Xun-Yi exploration area, South Ordos Basin[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology,2021,35(4):708-716.
[19] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会.烃源岩地球化学评价方法:SY/T 5735-2019[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
Standardization Committee for Petroleum Geological Exploration. Geochemical evaluation method of source rocks:SY/T 5735-2019[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2019.
[20] 王森.甘肃中小型盆地陆相侏罗系煤系烃源岩特征及其页岩油指示意义[D].兰州:兰州大学,2021.
WANG Sen. Characteristics of Jurassic coal-bearing source rocks and its shale oil significance in medium and small basins of Gansu Province[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University,2021.
[21] 李程.松辽盆地梨树断陷中央构造带烃源岩地球化学特征研究[D].武汉:长江大学,2018.
LI Cheng. Geochemical characteristics research of source rocks from median tectonic zone of Lishu depression in Songliao Basin [D]. Wuhan: Yangtze University,2018.
[22] 杨哲.乍得Bongor盆地烃源岩地球化学特征[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2019.
YANG Zhe. Geochemical characteristics of source rocks in the Bongor Basin, Chad[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum-Beijing,2019.
[23] 舒豫川,胡广,庞谦,等. 柴达木盆地咸湖相烃源岩特征——以英西地区下干柴沟组上段为例[J].断块油气田,2021,28(2):179-186.
SHU Yuchuan, HU Guang, PANG Qian, et al. Characteristics of source rocks of salt lake facies in Qaidam Basin:Taking upper member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in Yingxi region as an example[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2021,28(2):179-186.
[1] 许宪金, 郭志强, 苏伟明, 华夏, 刘敢强, 高毓璐. 威远地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩有机质特征——以W 202H7-2D井为例[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(2): 130-135.
[2] 方锡贤, 孙凤华, 李三明, 钱其锁. ZT 1井钻探分析及周口TZ-SQ凹陷勘探思考[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 10-16.
[3] 王娜, 牟连刚, 董雄英, 白晶, 林常梅, 周静, 何川, 刘会纺, 李昊东. 上古生界煤系烃源岩显微组分组成及生烃特征——以渤海湾盆地石炭-二叠系烃源岩为例[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(S1): 100-107.
[4] 马青春. 页岩油录井综合评价方法探索——以冀东油田NP 2-SL井为例[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(S1): 13-18.
[5] 王研, 杨光照, 滕工生, 王洪伟. 孤店断陷致密气储集层录井快速解释评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(4): 62-70.
[6] 张文雅, 颜怀羽, 李娟, 张秀峰, 郝丽, 陈京原, 郭素杰, 张君子, 陈燕. 页岩油“三类、三性”录井评价方法及其在饶阳凹陷的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(2): 79-85.
[7] 张丽艳, 秦文凯. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷页岩油录井解释评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(4): 55-61.
[8] 李凤霞, 高勇, 汪津, 郑悦, 曾建宏, 庄红妹. 沧东凹陷孔二段常非一体化成藏研究与实践[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(2): 95-99.
[9] 张绍辉,吴志超,王冠,岳鹏 . 洋心次凹泰二段致密油形成条件与“甜点区”评价[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(04): 115-119.
[10] 张连梁,金兴明,张晓晖,李强,谢皓亮,孔令松,李会光 . X射线元素录井在柴达木盆地英西地区岩性识别的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(04): 28-33.
[11] 董晓伟 刘爱平 钱茂路 梁媛媛 马 红 . 西非裂谷系尼日尔Termit盆地烃源岩地球化学特征分析与原油分类[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(02): 87-92.
[12] 马驰骅 马宝军 周安滨 杨 鑫 申方乐 徐大伟 . 霸县凹陷鄚州地区油气成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(02): 80-83.
[13] 吴文明 谷会霞 周慧成 李国强 李雪瑞 张海东. 马朗凹陷芦草沟组致密油储集层解释评价[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(01): 67-72.
[14] 李 少 龙. 雷家地区致密储集层评价及压裂层位优选[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(01): 54-57,62.
[15] 于 超 孙超囡. 歧口凹陷古近系沙一段烃源岩成烃环境与沉积有机相研究[J]. 录井工程, 2015, 26(04): 70-73,80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!