录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 44-48.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.03.007

• 解释评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地太原组灰岩储层气测录井评价方法

滕飞启①,②, 阎荣辉③, 吴明松①,②, 李品伟④, 周晶④, 王华杰④   

  1. ①中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院;
    ②低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室;
    ③中国石油长庆油田分公司工程技术管理部;
    ④中国石油长庆油田分公司第三采气厂
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-11 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-10
  • 作者简介:滕飞启 工程师,1982 年生,2006 年毕业于中国地质大学（北京）资源勘查工程专业,现在中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院主要从事测录井评价解释工作。通信地址：710018 陕西省西安市未央区凤城四路长庆油田勘探开发研究院。电话：18089204920。E-mail：tfq2_cq@petrochina.com.cn

Gas logging evaluation method of Taiyuan Formation limestone reservoirs in Ordos Basin

TENG Feiqi①,②, YAN Ronghui③, WU Mingsong①,②, LI Pinwei④, ZHOU Jing④, WANG Huajie④   

  1. ①Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018,China;
    ②National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low Permeability Oil & Gas Fields, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018,China;
    ③Engineering Technology Management Department of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an,Shaanxi 710018,China;
    ④No.3 Gas Production Plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Ordos, Inner Mongolia 017010,China
  • Received:2023-04-11 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-10

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

59

摘要： 太原组灰岩储层作为近几年鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界勘探目标新层系,录井已有明显含气性显示,虽然具备天然气成藏条件,但基于碎屑岩的常规方法气测录井解释结论与试气成果符合率较低。通过筛选气测全烃基值、全烃相对峰面积、储层有效厚度、气测异常显示厚度、全烃基值抬升值5项参数构建气测评价因子,并结合现场试气数据建立气测评价因子解释图板,绘制气测评价因子等值线图定量评价储层含气性,形成了针对灰岩储层地质特征的录井解释新方法。利用该方法评价单井产能与试气结果吻合度较高,对鄂尔多斯盆地太原组灰岩勘探潜力评价和有利目标区优选提供了较为可靠的录井依据。

关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 太原组, 灰岩, 气测录井, 气测评价因子

Abstract: As new target strata of Upper Paleozoic exploration in Ordos Basin in recent years, Taiyuan Formation limestone reservoirs have obvious gas bearing shows in mud logging. Although natural gas accumulation conditions are available, the interpretation conclusions of conventional gas logging methods based on clastic rocks have a low coincidence rate with the gas testing results. Gas logging evaluation factor was constructed by screening five parameters： total hyarocarbon base value, total hydrocarbon relative peak area, reservoir effective thickness, gas logging abnormal showing thickness and total hydrocarbon base value uplift. Combined with on-site gas testing data, a gas logging evaluation factor interpretation chart was established, and a contour map of gas logging evaluation factor was drawn to quantitatively evaluate the gas bearing properties of the reservoirs, forming a new mud logging interpretation method for the geological characteristics of limestone reservoirs. The evaluations of single well productivity by this method are highly consistent with the gas testing results, providing a reliable mud logging basis for evaluating the exploration potential and optimizing favorable target areas for Taiyuan Formation limestones in Ordos Basin.

Key words: Ordos Basin, Taiyuan Formation, limestone, gas logging, gas logging evaluation factor

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 付金华,段晓文,席胜利.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界气藏特征[J].天然气工业,2000,20(6):16-19.
FU Jinhua, DUAN Xiaowen, XI Shengli.Characteristics of Upper Paleozoic gas reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2000,20(6):16-19.
[2] 郭德运. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界沉积体系研究[D].西安:西北大学,2009.
GUO Deyun.The study of sedimentary system of Upper Paleozoic in east Ordos Basin[D].Xi'an:Northwest University,2009.
[3] 何自新,付金华,席胜利,等.苏里格大气田成藏地质特征[J].石油学报,2003,24(2):6-12.
HE Zixin, FU Jinhua, XI Shengli, et al.Geological features of reservoir formation of Sulige Gas Field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(2):6-12.
[4] 库细锋. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界太原组页岩气资源潜力评价与选区[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014.
KU Xifeng.Resource potential evaluation and favorable exploration areas prediction of shale gas in Upper Paleozoic Taiyuan Formation in Ordos Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2014.
[5] 毛亚辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘早二叠世太原组沉积特征及岩相古地理研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2020.
MAO Yahui.Study on sedimentary characteristics and lithofacies paleogeography of Early Permian Taiyuan Formation in the eastern Ordos Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2020.
[6] 姜烨,李宝芳.鄂尔多斯东北部太原组上部灰岩段高分辨层序地层分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(3):5-8.
JIANG Ye, LI Baofang.High-resolution sequence analysis on limestone Member,Upper Taiyuan Formation,northeastern Ordos[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2002,30(3):5-8.
[7] 魏新善,王飞雁,王怀厂,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部二叠系太原组灰岩储层特征[J].天然气工业,2005,25(4):16-18.
WEI Xinshan, WANG Feiyan, WANG huaichang, et al.Characteristics of Taiyuan Formation limestone reservoir of Permian in Eastern Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(4):16-18.
[8] 韩文学,麻伟娇,陶士振,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界灰岩烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J].地球科学,2018,43(2):600-609.
HAN Wenxue, MA Weijiao, TAO Shizhen,et al.Hydrocarbon generation potential evaluation of Upper Paleozoic limestone in Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science,2018,43(2):600-609.
[9] 覃小丽,李荣西,席胜利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部地区太原组储层黏土矿物特征及成因[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):49-57.
QIN Xiaoli, LI Rongxi, XI Shengli,et al.Characteristics and origin of clay minerals of Taiyuan Formation in eastern Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):49-57.
[10] 杨华,刘新社,闫小雄,等.鄂尔多斯盆地神木气田的发现与天然气成藏地质特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(6):1-13.
YANG Hua,LIU Xinshe,YAN Xiaoxiong,et al.The Shenmu Gas Field in Ordos Basin:Its discovery and reservoir-forming geological characteristics[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(6):1-13.
[11] 兰朝利,张君峰,陶维祥,等.鄂尔多斯盆地神木气田太原组沉积特征与演化[J].地质学报,2011,85(4):533-542.
LAN Chaoli, ZHANG Junfeng, TAO Weixiang,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of the Upper Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation,Shenmu Gasfield,northeastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2011,85(4):533-542.
[12] 任光军. 气测录井技术的进展及气测资料新用途的探讨[J].山东地质,2003,19(增刊):51-55.
REN Guangjun.Study on development of gas-logging technique and new usage of gas-logging information[J].Geology of Shandong,2003,19(S):51-55.
[13] 刘强国,朱清祥.录井方法与原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:164-218.
LIU Qiangguo,ZHU Qingxiang.Mud logging method and principle[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011:164-218.
[14] 李祖遥,胡文亮,夏瑜,等.利用气测录井资料识别油气层类型方法研究[J].海洋石油,2015,35(1):78-85.
LI Zuyao, HU Wenliang, XIA Yu, et al.Studies about the method for identification of the oil and gas layer types with gas logging data[J].Offshore Oil,2015,35(1):78-85.
[15] 王立东,罗平.气测录井定量解释方法探讨[J].录井工程,2001,12(3):1-10.
WANG Lidong, LUO Ping.Discussion on quantitative interpretation method of gas logging[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2001,12(3):1-10.
[16] 胡延忠,吴文明,孟建华.气测录井烃类比值和烃气指数图板的建立与应用[J].录井工程,2009,20(2):11-13.
HU Yanzhong, WU Wenming,MENG Jianhua.Establishment and application of hydrocarbon ratio and hydrocarbon gas index charts of gas logging[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2009,20(2):11-13.
[17] 符理想. 气测录井影响因素和气测曲线异常形态分析[J].西部探矿工程,2021(8):97-100.
FU Lixiang.Analysis of influencing factors of gas logging and abnormal patterns of gas logging curves[J].West-China Exploration Engineering,2021(8):97-100.
[18] 李永胜,杜巧娟,刘治恒,等.气测录井在三边地区延长组储集层解释评价中的应用[J].录井工程,2019,30(4):62-67.
LI Yongsheng, DU Qiaojuan, LIU Zhiheng, et al.Application of gas logging to reservoir interpretation and evaluation of Yanchang Formation in Sanbian area[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2019,30(4):62-67.
[19] 郑新卫,刘喆,卿华,等.气测录井影响因素及校正[J].录井工程,2012,23(3):20-24.
ZHENG Xinwei, LIU Zhe, QING Hua,et al.Factors influencing gas logging and correction[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2012,23(3):20-24.
[20] 滕飞启,傅鹏,朱更更,等.基于燃烧热值对气测全烃与组分函数关系的探讨[J].录井工程,2020,31(1):19-21.
TENG Feiqi, FU Peng, ZHU Genggeng,et al.Discussion on functional relation between total hydrocarbon and composition of gas logging based on combustion heat value[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(1):19-21.
[1] 刘土亮, 胡向阳, 袁伟, 吴健, 杨冬. 基于测录井资料的储层流体类型评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 55-62.
[2] 李戈东, 谭伟雄, 马猛, 陈铭帅, 杜波. 一种基于参数重构的气测录井解释方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 39-43.
[3] 刘长春, 杨永兴, 方铁园, 杨雯婷, 王义俊, 李德胜. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油优质储层评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 49-52.
[4] 符强, 谭忠健, 李鸿儒, 郭明宇, 刘志伟, 苑仁国. 基于气测与地化多参数组合的录井油气水解释模型[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2): 65-71.
[5] 隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75.
[6] 景社, 蔡军, 王雷, 兰晶晶, 袁胜斌. 油基钻井液条件下气测衍生参数法的构建与在流体判识中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 54-60.
[7] 妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111.
[8] 张文雅, 张春阳, 刘治恒, 朱更更, 胡洋, 李楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区太原组铝土岩储层录井评价[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 41-48.
[9] 朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66.
[10] 刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83.
[11] 滕飞启, 衣德强, 王嘉鑫, 吴明松, 贾连超, 李永胜. 基于气测衍生参数的储层含气性评价方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 42-45.
[12] 王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎. 基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 46-51.
[13] 刘春锋, 熊志武, 周平. 西湖凹陷低孔低渗储层气测录井识别技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 46-50.
[14] 吴佳, 陈灿珠, 殷文荣, 孔越, 孙颖, 何成山. 气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 69-72.
[15] 沈柏坪, 李志水, 王丹丹, 马铭杰, 孟祥文, 史晓波. 基于元素录井的拟合伽马在地层卡取中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 33-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨蕴泽, 刘庆新, 张发强, 杨晶, 张丽雪, 迟敬柏. 定量颗粒荧光分析技术在准噶尔盆地哈山地区浅部储层中的应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 22 -31 .
[2] 田立强, 熊亭, 邓卓峰, 梁欣怡, 田宇, 雷宇田. 基于地化录井技术的储层快速评价方法研究——以恩平凹陷北部斜坡带为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 32 -38 .
[3] 杨毅, 熊亭, 毛敏, 袁胜斌, 曹英权. 惠州凹陷X构造潜山复杂岩性识别与流体评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 89 -96 .
[4] 张耀先, 李开荣, 张鹏翔, 刘瑾, 杜聪. 石油钻探自锁式钻具倒扣装置的研制[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 102 -106 .
[5] 汪磊. 微钻时录井技术在冀东油田的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 9 -17 .
[6] 徐婕, 姜维寨, 牛华夏, 杨学辛, 戴广阔, 杨清纯. 基于录井参数不确定性的随钻地层压力分析预测[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 7 -14 .
[7] 李戈东, 谭伟雄, 马猛, 陈铭帅, 杜波. 一种基于参数重构的气测录井解释方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 39 -43 .
[8] 温海涛, 夏良冰, 郭明宇, 张建斌, 袁亚东. 气测烃比值筛选法在渤海低阻油层水平段随钻决策中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 68 -73 .
[9] 方铁园, 马宏伟, 郭龙飞, 黄子舰, 王海涛, 焦艳爽. 智慧录井平台建设及其在长庆油田的创新应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 97 -101 .
[10] 韩明辉, 杨雪, 李凯. 黔西北威宁地区龙街向斜祥摆组受热-生烃演化史及气体成因[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 119 -126 .

版权所有 © 2018 《录井工程》编辑部    津ICP备2022007892号-1
地址： 天津市大港油田三号院 (214126)
电话：(022)25921389,25978857,25921393,25921391　 Email:ljgc@cnpc.com.cn;ljjs@cnpc.com.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发