录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 68-73.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.03.011

• 解释评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

气测烃比值筛选法在渤海低阻油层水平段随钻决策中的应用

温海涛, 夏良冰, 郭明宇, 张建斌, 袁亚东   

  1. ①中海油能源发展股份有限公司工程技术分公司;
    ②中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-07 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-10
  • 作者简介:温海涛 工程师,1989 年生,2013 年毕业于东北石油大学资源勘查工程专业,现在中海油能源发展股份有限公司工程技术分公司从事钻井地质相关工作。通信地址:300459 天津市滨海新区海川路2121 号海洋石油大厦C 座。电话:15822655280。E-mail:wenht@cnooc.com.cn

Gas logging hydrocarbon ratio screening method for decision making while drilling in horizontal section of low resistivity reservoir in Bohai Sea

WEN Haitao, XIA Liangbing, GUO Mingyu, ZHANG Jianbin, YUAN Yadong   

  1. ①CNOOC Ener Tech-Drilling & Production Co.,Tianjin 300459,China;
    ②Tianjin Branch,CNOOC(China) Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2023-07-07 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-10

摘要: 渤海Q油田馆陶组新发现的低阻油层电阻率2~3 Ω·m,与水层电阻率相近,该油田开发时测井仅为随钻电阻率和自然伽马两条常规测井曲线,且井型为水平井,根据常规测井曲线随钻快速解释油水层难度大,相比而言,区域气测录井资料齐全,能够反映储层的含油气丰度,利于快速判别油水边界。基于油田已钻低阻油层老井气测录井资料复查分析,在水平段钻进时,运用气测录井烃比值筛选法,筛选出C1/C2及(C4+C5)/C3两个随钻烃比值评价参数并建立解释标准。经过井场实际应用表明,该录井解释方法的解释结论与实际生产情况吻合,判断符合率高,有效节省了水平段进尺,节约了钻井作业成本,具有较高的应用价值。

关键词: 水平井, 低阻油层, 烃比值筛选, 随钻解释

Abstract: The resistivity of newly discovered low resistivity reservoir in Guantao Formation of Q oilfield in Bohai Sea is 2-3 Ω·m, similar to the resistivity of water layer. During the development of this oilfield, only two conventional logging curves, namely resistivety while drilling and natural gamma,are used for logging. The well type is horizontal well, so it is difficult to quickly interpret oil and water formations while drilling according to conventional logging curves. In contrast, the regional gas logging data are complete, which can reflect the oil and gas abundance of the reservoir and is conducive to the rapid identification of oil and water boundaries. Through the review and analysis of the gas logging data of low resistivity reservoir of the drilled wells in the oilfield, the gas logging hydrocarbon ratio screening method is used to screen out two hydrocarbon ratio evaluation parameters while drilling: C1/C2 and (C4+C5)/C3, and the interpretation standards are established. Through the practical application of the well site, the interpretation conclusion of this method is consistent with the actual production situation, the judgment coincidence rate is high, the footage of the horizontal section is effectively saved, the drilling operation cost is saved, and it has high application value.

Key words: horizontal well, low resistivity reservoir, hydrocarbon ratio screening, interpretation while drilling

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 刘嘉程. 秦皇岛32-6油田馆陶组低阻油层成因及分布规律研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京),2021.
LIU Jiacheng.Genesis and distribution of low resistivity reservoir in the Guantao Formation of QHD 32-6 oilfield[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2021.
[2] 惠卓雄,王小鄂,王俊芳. 综合解释评价低阻油气层方法研究[J]. 录井工程,2004,15(4):26-29,46.
HUI Zhuoxiong, WANG Xiaoe, WANG Junfang.Research for the method of comprehensive interpretation and evaluation of low resistivity pay zones[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2004,15(4):26-29,46.
[3] 郑华,李云鹏,徐锦绣,等. 渤海海域低阻油层地质成因机理与识别:以辽东湾旅大A油田为例[J]. 断块油气田,2018,25(1):22-28.
ZHENG Hua, LI Yunpeng, XU Jinxiu, et al.Geological genetic mechanism and identification of low resistivity reservoir in Bohai Sea area: A case study of LD-A oilfield in Liaodong Bay[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2018,25(1):22-28.
[4] 刘文超,张国坤,李强,等. 环渤中西洼馆陶组低阻油层微观成因及其主控因素[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,33(6):27-33.
LIU Wenchao, ZHANG Guokun, LI Qiang, et al.Microscopic forming causes and main control factors of low-resistivity reservoirs of Guantao Formation in western subsag of Bozhong sag[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2018,33(6):27-33.
[5] 汪瑞宏,崔云江,陆云龙,等. 渤海油田中深层低阻油层测井特征及识别[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2016,32(11):26-31.
WANG Ruihong, CUI Yunjiang, LU Yunlong, et al.Logging characteristics and identification of medium-deep low resistivity oil reservoirs in Bohai oilfield[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2016,32(11):26-31.
[6] 王守君,刘振江,谭忠健,等. 勘探监督手册(地质分册)[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2013:43-44.
WANG Shoujun, LIU Zhenjiang, TAN Zhongjian, et al.Exploration supervision manual (Geology Volume)[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2013:43-44.
[7] 夏良冰,温海涛,胡云,等. 气体比率法的改进及其在渤海油田解释评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程,2016,27(4):49-53.
XIA Liangbing, WEN Haitao, HU Yun, et al.Improvement of gas ratio method and its application in interpretation and evaluation of Bohai Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2016,27(4):49-53.
[8] 余明发,边环玲,庄维,等.气测录井皮克斯勒图板解释方法适用性解析[J].录井工程,2013,24(1):14-19.
YU Mingfa, BIAN Huanling, ZHUANG Wei, et al.Applicability analysis of Pixler chart interpretation method for gas logging[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2013,24(1):14-19.
[9] 尚锁贵,黄小刚. FLAIR气测系统及其在渤海湾盆地低电阻率油气层的应用[J]. 录井工程,2007,18(4):40-45.
SHANG Suogui, HUANG Xiaogang.FLAIR gas logging system and its application in the oil and gas zone of low resistivity in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2007,18(4):40-45.
[10] 李战奎,罗鹏,刘坤,等. 气测录井储集层流体性质识别的新方法:正-异烷烃比值图板法[J]. 录井工程,2017,28(4):61-63,69.
LI Zhankui, LUO Peng, LIU Kun, et al.A new method for identifying reservoir fluid properties with gas logging:Chart for the ratio of normal alkane to isoalkane[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2017,28(4):61-63,69.
[11] 刘春锋,熊志武,周平. 西湖凹陷低孔低渗储层气测录井识别技术[J]. 录井工程,2022,33(1):46-50.
LIU Chunfeng, XIONG Zhiwu, ZHOU Ping.Gas logging identification technology of low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in Xihu sag[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2022,33(1):46-50.
[12] 胡延忠,吴文明,孟建华. 气测录井烃类比值和烃气指数图板的建立与应用[J]. 录井工程,2009,20(2):11-13,52.
HU Yanzhong, WU Wenming, MENG Jianhua.The chart establishment and application of hydrocarbons ratio and hydrocarbon gas index for gas logging[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2009,20(2):11-13,52.
[13] 苏朝博,胡云,苑仁国,等. RISExpress V2.0软件在井场随钻地质跟踪中的应用[J]. 录井工程,2022,33(1):94-99.
SU Zhaobo, HU Yun, YUAN Renguo, et al.Application of RISExpress V2.0 software in well site geological tracking while drilling[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2022,33(1):94-99.
[1] 任瑞川, 唐万宇, 贾欣磊, 张春, 梁斌, 王臣. 水平井地质导向技术在港西底水稠油油藏中的推广应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 113-118.
[2] 张雨欣, 李长洪, 沈文洁, 叶庆丽, 田旺东, 姜全达. 长庆油田上古生界河流相砂体叠置模式研究及其在提高水平井储层钻遇率中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2): 129-138.
[3] 王俊, 岳红星, 秦榜伟, 罗鸿成, 龚超, 王跃昆. 吉木萨尔页岩油录井综合地质导向技术应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 47-53.
[4] 向克满, 唐诚, 王崇敬, 梁波, 凡刚. 川南D区水平井靶区小层的UMAP算法判别图板研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 18-23.
[5] 付基友, 罗宏斌, 陈乃志, 张智慧, 张立明, 魏世亮. 火成岩储层水平井随钻录井综合评价技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 35-40.
[6] 李柯, 唐诚, 王崇敬, 梁波, 施强, 欧传根. 川南页岩小微尺度断层井震结合识别方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 125-132.
[7] 赵红燕, 廖勇, 项克伟, 邹筱春, 陈辉, 石元会. 起伏型地层水平段井筒轨迹控制方法[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 117-120.
[8] 徐志, 王芳, 李丹, 张晓丹, 马浩. AS油田特低渗油藏超短水平井加密攻关与实践[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 97-102.
[9] 谷红陶, 刘江涛. 川东南平桥区块页岩气水平井地质导向关键技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 109-115.
[10] 黄余金. 储层界面预测新方法在水平井地质导向中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 18-23.
[11] 彭业雄, 黄治梁, 李仕芳, 贾浩, 方铁园, 刘芳芳. 多种录井技术在水平井射孔井段优选中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 60-64.
[12] 吴早平, 李三明, 蒋融. 录井大数据在水平井开发区潜力评价中的应用——以大牛地气田D 8-D 10井区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 73-80.
[13] 宋明会. 地质工程一体化录井综合导向模式设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 90-93.
[14] 梁斌, 任瑞川, 程琦, 曾济楚, 王金友, 吴生. 水平井地质导向关键技术研究及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 37-42.
[15] 彭超, 邓津辉, 曹军, 袁亚东, 张向前, 罗鹏. 渤海垦利A区块低阻油层成因分析及综合录井识别方法应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 84-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 汪磊. 微钻时录井技术在冀东油田的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 9 -17 .
[2] 徐婕, 姜维寨, 牛华夏, 杨学辛, 戴广阔, 杨清纯. 基于录井参数不确定性的随钻地层压力分析预测[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 7 -14 .
[3] 李戈东, 谭伟雄, 马猛, 陈铭帅, 杜波. 一种基于参数重构的气测录井解释方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 39 -43 .
[4] 方铁园, 马宏伟, 郭龙飞, 黄子舰, 王海涛, 焦艳爽. 智慧录井平台建设及其在长庆油田的创新应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 97 -101 .
[5] 韩明辉, 杨雪, 李凯. 黔西北威宁地区龙街向斜祥摆组受热-生烃演化史及气体成因[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 119 -126 .
[6] 杨蕴泽, 刘庆新, 张发强, 杨晶, 张丽雪, 迟敬柏. 定量颗粒荧光分析技术在准噶尔盆地哈山地区浅部储层中的应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 22 -31 .
[7] 田立强, 熊亭, 邓卓峰, 梁欣怡, 田宇, 雷宇田. 基于地化录井技术的储层快速评价方法研究——以恩平凹陷北部斜坡带为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 32 -38 .
[8] 杨毅, 熊亭, 毛敏, 袁胜斌, 曹英权. 惠州凹陷X构造潜山复杂岩性识别与流体评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 89 -96 .
[9] 张耀先, 李开荣, 张鹏翔, 刘瑾, 杜聪. 石油钻探自锁式钻具倒扣装置的研制[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 102 -106 .
[10] 任瑞川, 唐万宇, 贾欣磊, 张春, 梁斌, 王臣. 水平井地质导向技术在港西底水稠油油藏中的推广应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 113 -118 .