录井工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 89-96.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.03.014

• 解释评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

惠州凹陷X构造潜山复杂岩性识别与流体评价方法

杨毅, 熊亭, 毛敏, 袁胜斌, 曹英权   

  1. ①中法渤海地质服务有限公司;
    ②中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-20 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-10
  • 作者简介:杨毅 工程师,1979 年生,2002 年毕业于中国石油大学(北京)地质工程专业,现在中法渤海地质服务有限公司从事资料解释与研究方面的工作。通信地址:300457 天津市经济技术开发区信环西路19 号天河科技园1 号楼3 层中法渤海地质服务有限公司。电话:(022)65310725。E-mail:yangyi@cfbgc.com

Complex lithology identification and fluid evaluation methods of buried hills of X structure in Huizhou depression

YANG Yi, XIONG Ting, MAO Min, YUAN Shengbin, CAO Yingquan   

  1. ①China France Bohai Geoservices Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300457,China;
    ②Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC (China) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China
  • Received:2023-07-20 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-10

摘要: 为了解决惠州凹陷X构造潜山岩性复杂、流体类型多样、含油气丰度评价标准不一等问题,基于已钻潜山井的岩石薄片鉴定及元素录井资料,对研究区潜山储层复杂岩性的镜下微观成分、结构及构造特征进行梳理,优选特征元素Si、Fe、Mg含量建立复杂岩性识别图板,形成了适用于研究区潜山复杂岩性的快速识别方法;基于FLAIR流体录井资料,优选出表征轻质油和凝析气烃组分差异的参数C1相对含量和Q'值对轻质油层和凝析气层进行区分,结合校正值单位岩石甲烷气体体积与C1异常倍数建立解释图板识别油气层和干层。经后续的分析化验及取样、测试等资料验证,该方法在潜山复杂岩性识别中准确率可达93.8%,流体解释评价符合率为89.5%,在随钻过程中可以为复杂岩性的判断与流体评价提供理论依据,对下步地质作业方案制定及勘探作业降本增效起到指导作用,具有较强的推广应用价值。

关键词: 岩性识别, 流体评价, 岩石薄片鉴定, 元素录井, FLAIR流体录井, 惠州凹陷

Abstract: In order to solve the problems of complex lithology, diverse fluid types, and inconsistent evaluation standards for hydrocarbon-bearing abundance in the X structure buried hills of Huizhou depression, based on the petrographic thin section analysis and element logging data of the drilled buried hill wells, the microscopic composition, framework and structural characteristics of the complex lithology under the microscope for the buried hill reservoirs in the study area were sorted out. Select the content of Si, Fe and Mg feature elements to establish the complex lithological discrimination charts, forming the fast identification methods suitable for the complex lithology of buried hills in the study area. On the basis of FLAIR fluid logging data, C1 relative content and Q' characterizing the differences in hydrocarbon components between light oil and condensate gas were optimized to distinguish the light oil layers and condensate gas layers. Combined with the correction value for methane gas volume per unit rock and C1 anomaly multiple, the interpretation charts were set up to identify light oil layers, condensate gas layers and dry layers. The methods have been applied in buried hills, with the accuracy of 93.8% in identifying complex lithology and a fluid interpretation and evaluation coincidence rate of 89.5% after subsequent analysis, sampling, testing and other data verification. During the drilling process, the methods can provide theoretical bases for the judgment of complex lithology and fluid evaluation, and guide the further making geological operation plan and reducing costs and increasing benefits in exploration operation, with stronger application value.

Key words: lithological discrimination, fluid evaluation, petrographic thin section analysis, element logging, FLAIR fluid logging, Huizhou depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 施和生,高阳东,刘军,等.珠江口盆地惠州26洼“源-汇-聚”特征与惠州26-6大油气田发现启示[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(4):777-791.
SHI Hesheng, GAO Yangdong, LIU Jun, et al.Characteristics of hydrocarbon source-migration-accumulation in Huizhou 26 sag and implications of the major Huizhou 26-6 discovery in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(4):777-791.
[2] 田立新,刘杰,张向涛,等.珠江口盆地惠州26-6大中型泛潜山油气田勘探发现及成藏模式[J].中国海上油气,2020,32(4):1-11.
TIAN Lixin, LIU Jie, ZHANG Xiangtao, et al.Discovery and accumulation pattern of HZ 26-6 large-medium sized pan-buried hill oil and gas field in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2020,32(4):1-11.
[3] 田立新,施和生,刘杰,等.珠江口盆地惠州凹陷新领域勘探重大发现及意义[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(4):22-30.
TIAN Lixin, SHI Hesheng, LIU Jie,et al.A major discovery and the significance of new frontier exploration in the Huizhou sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(4):22-30.
[4] 熊亭,邓卓峰,曹英权.潜山缝洞型储层随钻快速评价方法:以珠江口盆地惠州26-6构造为例[J].录井工程,2023,34(1):60-67.
XIONG Ting, DENG Zhuofeng, CAO Yingquan.Method of rapid evaluation while drilling for fracture-cavity reservoirs in buried hill: A case study of Huizhou 26-6 structure in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2023,34(1):60-67.
[5] 冷杰,刘杰,陈安清,等.珠江口盆地惠州26-6潜山中生代中基性火山岩储层成因[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2021,48(6):661-674.
LENG Jie, LIU Jie, CHEN Anqing, et al.Genesis of Mesozoic intermediate-basic volcanic reservoirs in Huizhou 26-6 buried hill, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2021,48(6):661-674.
[6] 马树明,李秀彬,李怀军,等.X射线衍射矿物分析技术在准噶尔盆地火成岩识别中的应用[J].录井工程,2020,31(4):16-21.
MA Shuming, LI Xiubin,LI Huaijun, et al.Application of X-ray diffraction mineralogical analysis technique in igneous rock identification in Junggar Basin[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(4):16-21.
[7] 曹英权,熊亭,袁胜斌,等.特色录井技术在低孔渗储层解释评价中的应用:以陆丰凹陷古近系为例[J].录井工程,2022,33(2):52-57.
CAO Yingquan, XIONG Ting, YUAN Shengbin, et al.Application of characteristic mud logging techniques in the interpretation and evaluation of low porosity and low permeability reservoirs: A case study of Paleogene in Lufeng sag[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2022,33(2):52-57.
[8] 孙源,袁胜斌,曹英权.南海东部X油田录井流体综合解释评价方法[J].录井工程,2021,32(2):70-75,82.
SUN Yuan, YUAN Shengbin, CAO Yingquan.Fluid comprehensive interpretation and evaluation method for mud logging in X oilfield in east of South China Sea[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2021,32(2):70-75,82.
[9] 白林坤,罗迎春,蒋钱涛,等.珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷文昌组FLAIR录井解释新方法[J].录井工程,2021,32(3):84-90.
BAI Linkun, LUO Yingchun, JIANG Qiantao, et al.New FLAIR logging interpretation method for Wenchang Formation in Lufeng sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2021,32(3):84-90.
[10] 吴昊晟,郭明宇,刘坤,等.基于FLAIR技术识别储层流体[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2018,15(15):30-34.
WU Haosheng, GUO Mingyu, LIU Kun, et al.Fluid identification method based on the technology of FLAIR well logging[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition),2018,15(15):30-34.
[11] 刘娟霞,刘朋波,袁胜斌,等.渤海油田轻质油气藏气测流体评价方法[J].海洋地质前沿,2017,33(11):54-59.
LIU Juanxia, LIU Pengbo, YUAN Shengbin, et al.Fluid evaluation of light oil-gas accumulations with gas logging in Bohai Oilfield[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2017,33(11):54-59.
[12] 余明发,吴国海,简笑鹰,等.气测录井三角形图板法的解析及拓展应用尝试[J].录井工程,2015,26(3):17-23.
YU Mingfa, WU Guohai, JIAN Xiaoying, et al.Analysis and extended application of gas logging triangle method[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2015,26(3):17-23.
[13] 彭文春,毛敏,杨毅,等.气测数据校正在录井综合解释中的应用[J].录井工程,2018,29(3):65-69.
PENG Wenchun, MAO Min, YANG Yi, et al.Application of gas logging data correction in mud logging comprehensive interpretation[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2018,29(3):65-69.
[1] 屈彦龙. 自然伽马能谱录井技术在川南地区威远构造页岩气勘探中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 15-21.
[2] 曹英权, 蒋钱涛, 熊亭, 袁胜斌, 邓卓峰. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷古近系高电阻率水层录井识别方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 74-80.
[3] 张文颖, 袁胜斌, 陈伟, 韩学彪, 刘永华. BP神经网络模型在元素-矿物转换中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 1-6.
[4] 李戈东, 谭伟雄, 马猛, 陈铭帅, 杜波. 一种基于参数重构的气测录井解释方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 39-43.
[5] 何成山. 元素录井技术在大港油田奥陶系潜山界面卡取中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2): 28-33.
[6] 向克满, 唐诚, 王崇敬, 梁波, 凡刚. 川南D区水平井靶区小层的UMAP算法判别图板研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 18-23.
[7] 温海涛, 郭明宇, 阚留杰, 苑仁国, 王建立. 元素特征组合法在BZ凝析气田开发井潜山界面预警中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 29-34.
[8] 胡宗敏, 张立刚, 罗光东, 王曲, 邓圣甲, 冯伟. 基于元素录井的深层火成岩抗钻特性评价[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 24-28.
[9] 韩学彪, 袁胜斌, 陈伟, 张文颖. 氧闭合模型在元素录井中的探索应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 13-18.
[10] 刘春锋, 申文龙, 秦德文, 熊志武. 东海丽水凹陷北部潜山岩性识别及储层预测技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 133-139.
[11] 李柯, 唐诚, 王崇敬, 梁波, 施强, 欧传根. 川南页岩小微尺度断层井震结合识别方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 125-132.
[12] 刘有武, 杨春龙, 曾志勇, 孟繁涛, 张培鑫. XRF元素录井技术在鄂尔多斯盆地西缘乌拉力克组页岩储层识别评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 27-33.
[13] 刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83.
[14] 张小虎, 李秀彬, 马树明, 张媛媛, 苑传江, 常华. 随钻伽马能谱录井技术在准噶尔盆地的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 8-12.
[15] 曹英权, 熊亭, 袁胜斌, 汪芯. 特色录井技术在低孔渗储层解释评价中的应用——以陆丰凹陷古近系为例[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 52-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王飞龙 王波利 何国贤. 核磁共振录井技术测量岩屑含油丰度的方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2009, 20(04): 9 -13 .
[2] 刘应忠 李一超 刘振江. 中国录井业务现状及发展对策[J]. 录井工程, 2012, 23(02): 1 -7 .
[3] 张 卫 张殿强 刘应忠 慈兴华 雷 军. 中国录井行业发展思考[J]. 录井工程, 2014, 25(02): 4 -6 .
[4] 阚留杰 毛 敏 陈 伟 胡 云 刘如明. 渤海油田潜山界面识别录井技术及其组合[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(03): 79 -83 .
[5] 王健,程建莉,戴荣东,肖建洪,郝金克,惠伟,蒲业 . 高分辨率层序随钻地层对比分析在录井现场中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(03): 137 -143 .
[6] 姬建飞, 袁胜斌, 倪朋勃, 胡云. 核Fisher判别分析方法在黄河口凹陷储集层流体解释评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(1): 65 -68 .
[7] 刘莹. 钻录井数据整合平台技术研究[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(1): 88 -92 .
[8] 何芬. 渤海A油田水淹层射孔方案研究与实践[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(3): 143 -147 .
[9] 滕飞启, 傅鹏, 朱更更, 吴明松, 张春阳, 王嘉鑫, 张文强. 基于燃烧热值对气测全烃与组分函数关系的探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(1): 19 -21 .
[10] 阎荣辉, 黄子舰, 杨永强, 田青青, 刘杰, 方铁园, 李艳霞. “互联网+”时代的智慧录井系统应用探索[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(2): 1 -5 .