地球物理方法在渤中34油田井漏预测中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2021.03.025

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤中34油田区域内构造活动强烈、断裂发育,裂缝性井漏频发。研究发现,中小尺度断层是造成井漏的主要因素。受地震资料分辨率的影响,应用常规地震剖面识别中小尺度断层难度较大,进而导致裂缝性井漏风险预测效果不佳,为提高预测评估井漏风险的精度,急需探索一种有效识别中小尺度断层的地球物理方法。通过对渤中34油田已钻井井漏特征分析,基于常规地震剖面、方差属性、蚂蚁体属性等地球物理方法识别渤中34油田中小尺度断层,建立井漏风险等级判识决策树,并根据井漏风险等级的不同采取了相应的钻井应对措施。实际应用表明,该方法在渤中34油田裂缝性井漏预测中具有良好的应用效果,能够实现优快钻井与漏失防控的有效耦合,具有现场可操作性强、识别准确度高的优点,为渤中34油田开发钻井工程预防井漏工作提供了重要技术支持。

关键词: 渤海油田, 方差体技术, 蚂蚁追踪技术, 裂缝性井漏

Abstract: It is found that meso-micro scale faults are the main factors of lost circulation in Bozhong 34 Oilfield where strong tectonic activity,well-developed faults and frequent fractured lost circulation exist. Affected by seismic data resolution,it is difficult to identify meso-micro scale faults using conventional seismic profiles,which leads to poor prediction of fractured lost circulation risk. To improve the accuracy of lost circulation risk prediction and assessment,it is urgent to explore a geophysical method to effectively identify meso-micro scale faults. The lost circulation risk grade decision tree is established through analysis of the lost circulation characteristics of wells drilled in Bozhong 34 Oilfield and identification of meso-micro scale faults by geophysical methods of conventional seismic profile,variance attribute,and ant body attribute,and corresponding drilling countermeasures are taken according to different risk levels of lost circulation. This method shows good effects in application to fractured lost circulation prediction in Bozhong 34 oilfield. It realizes effective coupling of excellent-fast drilling and lost circulation prevention and control,has strong field feasibility and high accuracy in identification,and provides important technical support for the prevention of lost circulation in the development and drilling engineering of Bozhong 34 Oilfield.

Key words: Bohai Oilfield, variance attribute technology, ant tracking technology, fractured lost circulation

中图分类号:

TE132.1

张向前, 谭忠健, 邓津辉, 曹军, 苑仁国, 袁亚东, 赵才顺. 地球物理方法在渤中34油田井漏预测中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 141-146.

ZHANG Xiangqian, TAN Zhongjian, DENG Jinhui, CAO Jun, YUAN Renguo, YUAN Yadong, ZHAO Caishun. Application of geophysical methods in lost circulation prediction of Bozhong 34 Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2021, 32(3): 141-146.

参考文献

[1] 侯贵廷,钱祥麟,宋新民. 渤海湾盆地形成机制研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),1998,34(4):503-509.
HOU Guiting,QIAN Xianglin,SONG Xinmin.The origin of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,1998,34(4):503-509.
[2] 卢世浩,杨红满,胡江涛. 主曲率法预测顺北区块二叠系井漏研究[J]. 录井工程,2019,30(4):17-21.
LU Shihao,YANG Hongman,HU Jiangtao.Leakage prediction of Permian in Shunbei Block by principal curvature method[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2019,30(4):17-21.
[3] 刘彪,李宬晓,李双贵,等. 基于支持向量回归的井漏预测[J]. 钻采工艺,2019,42(6):17-20.
LIU Biao,LI Chengxiao,LI Shuanggui,et al.Leakage prediction based on SVR[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2019,42(6):17-20.
[4] 黄花香,熊艳,邓瑛,等. 川东北地区恶性井漏层段地震预测技术探索[J]. 石油物探,2005,44(2):142-146.
HUANG Huaxiang,XIONG Yan,DENG Ying,et al.Preliminary study on seismic prediction for severe leakage horizons in the Northeast Sichuan[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2005,44(2):142-146.
[5] 尹志军,李超,吕文杰,等. 渤中34-9油田古近系火山岩岩相特征与分布预测[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(5):63-72.
YIN Zhijun,LI Chao,LYU Wenjie,et al.Lithofacies characteristics and distribution prediction of Paleogene volcanic rocks in BZ 34-9 Oilfield[J]. China Offshore Oil & Gas,2020,32(5):63-72.
[6] 郭涛,杨波,陈磊,等.岩浆岩三维精细刻画——黄河口凹陷南斜坡渤中34-9油田的发现[J]. 中国海上油气,2016,28(2):71-77.
GUO Tao,YANG Bo,CHEN Lei,et al.3D fine description of magmatic rocks:The discovery of BZ 34-9 Oilfield in the southern slope of Huanghekou Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil & Gas,2016,28(2):71-77.
[7] 谭忠健,胡云,袁亚东,等.渤海海域裂缝性地层井漏机理研究——以渤中34-9油田为例[J]. 中国石油勘探,2021,26(2):127-136.
TAN Zhongjian,HU Yun,YUAN Yadong,et al.Lost circulation mechanism in fractured formation:A case study of BZ 34-9 Oilfield[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2021,26(2):127-136.
[8] 董星亮,王长利,刘书杰,等.海洋钻井手册[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2009:761-762.
DONG Xingliang,WANG Changli,LIU Shujie,et al.Ocean drilling manual[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009:761-762.
[9] 赵牧华,杨文强,崔辉霞.用方差体技术识别小断层及裂隙发育带[J]. 物探化探计算技术,2006,28(3):216-218.
ZHAO Muhua,YANG Wenqiang,CUI Huixia.Application of variance cube technology to the interpretation of small faults and fractured zones[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2006,28(3):216-218.
[10] 常益行. 地震属性技术在煤田断层识别中的应用[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2015,27(2):57-61.
CHANG Yixing.Application of seismic attribute technology in coalfield fault identification[J]. Coal Geology of China,2015,27(2):57-61.
[11] 李书瑜. 利用方差体技术有效识别断层[J]. 江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(3):59-60.
LI Shuyu.Effective identification for fault with variance technique[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,2003,25(3):59-60.
[12] 霍丽娜,张建军,郑良合,等.多属性断层解释技术在煤层气储层解释中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2014,49(增刊1):221-227.
HUO Lina,ZHANG Jianjun,ZHENG Lianghe,et al.Fault interpretation with multi-attribute technology in CBM reservoir interpretation[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2014,49(S1):221-227.
[13] 张瑞,文晓涛,李世凯,等.分频蚂蚁追踪在识别深层小断层中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展,2017,32(1):350-356.
ZHANG Rui,WEN Xiaotao,LI Shikai,et al.Application of frequency division ant-tracking in identifying deep minor fault[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(1):350-356.
[14] 杨辉. 蚂蚁追踪技术在地震资料精细解释中的应用[J]. 能源与环保,2017,39(4):21-26.
YANG Hui.Application of ant-tracking technology in fine interpretation of seismic data[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection,2017,39(4):21-26.
[15] 张欣. 蚂蚁追踪在断层自动解释中的应用——以平湖油田放鹤亭构造为例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2010,45(2):278-281.
ZHANG Xin.Application of ant-tracing algorithm in fault automatic interpretation:A case study on Fangheting structure in Pinghu Oilfield[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2010,45(2):278-281.
[16] 李楠,王龙颖,黄胜兵,等.利用高清蚂蚁体精细解释复杂断裂带[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2019,54(1):182-190.
LI Nan,WANG Longying,HUANG Shengbing,et al.Fine interpretation of complex fault zones by HD ant body[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2019,54(1):182-190.
[17] 马龙. 文南油田低级序复杂断块精细刻画研究[D]. 中国石油大学(华东),2016.
MA Long.Fine characterization of farewell complex fault block in Wennan Oilfield[D]. China University of Petroleum(East China),2016.
[18] 张磊,王晓鹏,谢涛,等.天然裂缝性地层漏失压力预测新模型[J]. 钻采工艺,2018,41(5):19-22.
ZHANG Lei,WANG Xiaopeng,XIE Tao,et al.A new model for leakage pressure prediction of natural fractured formation[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2018,41(5):19-22.
[19] 卢志远,张晓黎,张万龙,等.一种地震裂缝预测与岩石力学相结合评估井漏风险的新方法——以准噶尔盆地玛湖油田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学,2020,31(10):1453-1465.
LU Zhiyuan,ZHANG Xiaoli,ZHANG Wanlong,et al.A new method of leakage risk evaluation based on seismic fracture prediction and rock mechanics:A case study in A wellblock of Mahu Oilfield in Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,31(10):1453-1465.
[20] 胡国金,庹海洋,付琳,等.渤海火成岩发育区油田防漏堵漏技术认识与探讨[J]. 科学技术创新,2021(9):122-123.
HU Guojin,TUO Haiyang,FU Lin,et al.Understanding and discussion of leak prevention and plugging technology in oilfields in Bohai igneous rock development area[J]. Scientific and Technological Innovation,2021(9):122-123.
[21] 金衍,卢运虎,李再均.一种井漏层位钻前风险预测新方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2008,30(3):24-28.
JIN Yan,LU Yunhu,LI Zaijun.A new method predicting pre-drilling risk in lost circulation formation[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2008,30(3):24-28.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed