基于录井资料的乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩储层有效性评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2024.01.011

录井工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 67-73.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2024.01.011

基于录井资料的乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩储层有效性评价

张明扬^①, 陈玉蓉^②, 李晓晨^③, 侯庆林^①, 唐荷江^①, 阳祖河^①

①中国石油渤海钻探第二录井公司;
②中国石油渤海钻探第一录井公司;
③中国石油渤海钻探泥浆技术服务公司

收稿日期:2023-10-31 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-04-09
作者简介:张明扬工程师,1989年生,2015年毕业于中国矿业大学（北京）地质工程专业,硕士学位,现在中国石油渤海钻探第二录井分公司从事综合解释评价、地质工程一体化工作。通信地址：062552 河北省任丘市渤海中路056号渤海钻探第二录井分公司。电话：18631736125。E-mail：389123155@qq.com

Effectiveness evaluation of migmatitic granite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag based on mud logging data

ZHANG Mingyang^①, CHEN Yurong^②, LI Xiaochen^③, HOU Qinglin^①, TANG Hejiang^①, YANG Zuhe^①

①No.2 Mud Logging Company, BHDC, CNPC, Renqiu, Hebei 062550, China;
②No.1 Mud Logging Company, BHDC,CNPC, Tianjin 300280, China;
③Mud Service Company, BHDC, CNPC, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2023-10-31 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 孔缝发育程度、充填程度和连通性是乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩储层油气产量高低的主控因素。通过对乌兰花凹陷古生界混合花岗岩类变质岩潜山井的实物、岩矿、气测、XRD等资料进行综合分析及评价方法创新,利用实物观察法、薄片镜下观察法、全烃曲线形态法、钻时与全烃曲线叠合法、XRD填隙物识别法实现对储层的有效性评价,进而建立了基于多项录井资料的乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩储层划分标准,在现场应用中效果良好,为后期解释评价提供了科学依据。

关键词: 乌兰花凹陷, 混合花岗岩, 储层评价, 录井资料, 解释评价

Abstract: Filling degree, and connectivity of pore-fissures are the main controlling factors for the oil and gas production in the mixed granite reservoirs of the Wulanhua sag. Through the comprehensive analysis and innovative evaluation methods of physical, lithological, gas survey, XRD, and other data from the Paleozoic mixed granite metamorphic rock wells in the Wulanhua sag, and the method of physical observation, slice microscope observation, total hydrocarbon curve shape, drilling time and full hydrocarbon curve superposition and XRD filling material identification are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the reservoir, and then a division standard for the mixed granite reservoirs has been established based on multiple logging data. The application of this standard in the field has yielded good results and provided a scientific basis for later interpretation and evaluation.

Key words: Wulanhua sag, hybrid granite, reservoir evaluation, logging data, interpretation and evaluation

中图分类号:

TE132.1

张明扬, 陈玉蓉, 李晓晨, 侯庆林, 唐荷江, 阳祖河. 基于录井资料的乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩储层有效性评价[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 67-73.

ZHANG Mingyang, CHEN Yurong, LI Xiaochen, HOU Qinglin, TANG Hejiang, YANG Zuhe. Effectiveness evaluation of migmatitic granite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag based on mud logging data[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2024, 35(1): 67-73.

参考文献

[1] 朴勇信. 二连盆地乌兰花凹陷沉积相特征研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2016.
PIAO Yongxin.Sedimentary characteristics study on Wulanhua Sag, Erlian Basin[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2016.
[2] 陈敬国,白旭明,叶秋焱,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷火成岩区三维地震采集技术[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(5):65-72.
CHEN Jingguo, BAI Xuming, YE Qiuyan, et al.3D seismic acquisition technology of igneous rock area in Wulanhua Depression of Erlian Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(5):65-72.
[3] 赵政嘉,顾玉洁,史原鹏,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷花岗岩储层改造技术研究及应用[J].中国矿业,2019,28(5):72-76.
ZHAO Zhengjia, GU Yujie, SHI Yuanpeng, et al.Study and application of granite reservoirs reconstruction technology in Wulanhua sag, Erlian basin[J]. China Mining Magazine,2019,28(5):72-76.
[4] 沈澈,蒋有录,苏圣民,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷花岗岩潜山储层特征及发育模式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(6):12-19.
SHEN Che, JIANG Youlu, SU Shengmin, et al.Characteristics and development modes of the granite buried-hill reservoir in Wulanhua Sag of Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(6):12-19.
[5] 邢雅文,张以明,降栓奇,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷油气藏特征及分布规律[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(6):68-78.
XING Yawen, ZHANG Yiming, JIANG Shuanqi, et al.Characteristics and distribution of oil and gas reservoirs in Wulanhua sag, Erlian Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(6):68-78.
[6] 秦平,郭广峰,齐跃敏,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩潜山油藏储集层评价与分布规律研究[J].录井工程,2020,31(2):124-129.
QIN Ping, GUO Guangfeng, QI Yuemin, et al.Evaluation of mixed granite buried hill reservoirs in Wulanhua Sag,Erlian Basin and research on distribution law[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(2):124-129.
[7] 魏秀丽,王小明,项鑫,等.二连盆地乌兰花凹陷火山岩油藏成藏条件及成藏模式[C]//中国石油学会天然气专业委员会.第32届全国天然气学术年会(2020)论文集,2020.
WEI Xiuli, WANG Xiaoming, XIANG Xin, et al.Reservoir-forming conditions and reservoir-forming model of volcanic rock reservoir in Wulanhua Sag, Erlian Basin[C]//China Petroleum Society Natural Gas Professional Committee. Proceedings of the 32nd National Natural Gas Academic Conference(2020),2020.
[8] 宋立春. 油气层录井的精细解释方法:以吉林探区为例[J].世界地质,2009,28(1):92-97.
SONG Lichun.Precise logging interpretation methods for oil and gas layer in Jilin prospecting area[J]. Global Geology,2009,28(1):92-97.
[9] 方锡贤,程岩,熊玉芹,等.P2井特殊烃组分气测异常显示层探讨[J].录井工程,2006,17(1):43-46.
FANG Xixian, CHENG Yan, XIONG Yuqin, et al.Discussion on gas logging abnormal show zone with the special hydrocarbon components in P2 well[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2006,17(1):43-46.
[10] 张建山,刘建新,郝丽,等.气测曲线峰型形态定量化评价方法及其应用实例[J].录井工程,2020,31(1):12-18.
ZHANG Jianshan, LIU Jianxin,HAO Li, et al.Quantitative evaluation method of peak configuration of gas logging curve and application example[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(1):12-18.
[11] 汪芯,郭明宇,李鸿儒,等.基于录测资料的变质岩潜山优质储集层预测方法及其应用[J].录井工程,2021,32(1):73-79.
WANG Xin, GUO Mingyu, LI Hongru, et al.Prediction method of high-quality buried hill reservoirs of metamorphic rocks based on mud logging and well logging data and its application[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2021,32(1):73-79.
[12] 马青春,魏宝明,薛明侠,等.X射线衍射全岩录井在过渡岩类储集层评价中的应用[J].录井工程,2016,27(3):59-62.
MA Qingchun, WEI Baoming, XUE Mingxia, et al.Application of whole rock logging by X-ray diffraction to evaluation of transitional rock reservoirs[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2016,27(3):59-62.
[13] 王国富,王志忠.应用统计[M].长沙:中南大学出版社,2003.
WANG Guofu, WANG Zhizhong.Applied statistics[M]. Changsha:Central South University Press,2003.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	宋昀轩, 鲁法伟, 王雷, 张国栋, 赵幸滨. 东海西湖凹陷砂岩储层综合录井随钻孔隙度评价方法的建立及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 61-66.
[2]	田立强, 熊亭, 邓卓峰, 梁欣怡, 田宇, 雷宇田. 基于地化录井技术的储层快速评价方法研究——以恩平凹陷北部斜坡带为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 32-38.
[3]	刘土亮, 胡向阳, 袁伟, 吴健, 杨冬. 基于测录井资料的储层流体类型评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 55-62.
[4]	屈彦龙. 自然伽马能谱录井技术在川南地区威远构造页岩气勘探中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 15-21.
[5]	李仕芳, 贾浩, 盖文臣, 方铁园, 姚远, 张春朋. 离子色谱录井技术在气探井储层含水性识别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2): 45-50.
[6]	隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75.
[7]	熊亭, 邓卓峰, 曹英权. 潜山缝洞型储层随钻快速评价方法——以珠江口盆地惠州26-6构造为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 60-67.
[8]	汪磊. 微钻时录井技术在冀东油田的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 9-17.
[9]	贾然. 苏里格气田苏39区块下石盒子组盒8段储层综合评价[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 76-82.
[10]	付基友, 罗宏斌, 陈乃志, 张智慧, 张立明, 魏世亮. 火成岩储层水平井随钻录井综合评价技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 35-40.
[11]	刘涛, 乔德民, 晏巍, 刘永炜, 方铁园, 王海涛. 录井资料处理与模式识别技术在长庆油田录井解释评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 84-91.
[12]	刘永华, 倪朋勃, 黄小刚. 录井资料在西湖凹陷始新统平湖组气层评价中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 49-54.
[13]	王海涛, 阎荣辉, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 田青青, 李艳霞. 基于岩石热解法的原油密度、粘度预测模型研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 18-23.
[14]	殷黎明. 岩矿扫描录井技术在威远Z 207井的应用研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 35-41.
[15]	吴进波, 陈鸣, 杜超, 李兆平. 潜山储层裂缝形态对岩石导电效率的影响[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 109-114.

基于录井资料的乌兰花凹陷混合花岗岩储层有效性评价

Effectiveness evaluation of migmatitic granite reservoirs in Wulanhua sag based on mud logging data

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10