录井工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 52-60.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2024.01.009

• 解释评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

低阻水淹层地化录井识别技术在南海北部A油田的应用

李冬蕾, 胡琳, 王建伟, 邓薇, 贾元钊, 柴晓武   

  1. ①中国石油渤海钻探第二录井公司;
    ②中国石油渤海钻探第一录井公司
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-05 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-04-09
  • 作者简介:李冬蕾 工程师,1989年生,2013年毕业于重庆科技学院资源勘查工程专业,现在中国石油渤海钻探第二录井分司从事地质综合研究工作。通信地址:062552 河北省任丘市渤海钻探第二录井公司。电话:18631739532。E-mail:1657587432@qq.com

Application of geochemical logging identification technology of low resistivity water-flooded zones to A oilfield in the northern South China Sea

LI Donglei, HU Lin, WANG Jianwei, DENG Wei, JIA Yuanzhao, CHAI Xiaowu   

  1. ①No.2 Mud Logging Company, BHDC, CNPC, Renqiu, Hebei 062552,China;
    ②No.1 Mud Logging Company, BHDC, CNPC, Tianjin 300280,China
  • Received:2024-02-05 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-09

摘要: 在油田开发过程中,常采用注水方式为地层提供能量。由于储层的非均质性,通常物性好、连通性好的层位被快速水淹,剩余油较少,而物性差、连通性差的层位因注入水未波及,则留存较多剩余油。部署调整井开发剩余油需避开水淹层射孔,因此需要对水淹层进行准确识别。通过优选S1、nC24/nC29、∑(C1-C5)/∑(C1-C9)等地化录井优势参数进行有机组合,建立了基于地化谱图对比识别方法、热蒸发烃气相色谱参数nC24/nC29比值法,以及轻烃组分∑(C1-C5)/∑(C1-C9)比值与岩石热解S1交会图板法用于低阻水淹层地化录井识别。该技术在南海北部海域A油田的应用表明,水淹层识别符合率达到87.5%,取得了较好的应用效果,为油田开发避开水淹层提供了科学依据。

关键词: 低阻水淹层, 地化录井, 岩石热解, 热蒸发烃气相色谱, 轻烃组分分析, 交会图板

Abstract: In the process of oilfield development, water injection is often used to provide energy for the formation. Because of the heterogeneity of the reservoirs, the strata with good physical properties and good connectivity will be generally flooded quickly, resulting in less remaining oil, while the layers with poor physical properties and poor connectivity retain more remaining oil. To develop the remaining oil by deploying adjustment wells, it is necessary to avoid the water-flooded zones for perforation, so it is necessary to accurately identify the water-flooded zones. By optimizing the dominant parameters of geochemical logging such as S1, nC24/nC29, ∑(C1-C5)/∑(C1-C9), and combining them organically, the geochemical logging identification method based on geochemical spectrum comparison, the nC24/nC29 ratio method of thermal evaporation hydrocarbon gas chromatographic parameters, the light hydrocarbon component ∑(C1-C5)/∑(C1-C9) ratio and the rock pyrolysis S1 intersection chart method are established for the geochemical logging identification of low resistivity water-flooded zones. The application of the technology to A oilfield in the northern South China Sea shows that the coincidence rate of identifying water-flooded zones is 87.5%, and has achieved good application results, which provides a scientific basis for oilfield development to avoid water-flooded zones.

Key words: low resistivity water-flooded zone, geochemical logging, rock pyrolysis, thermal evaporation hydrocarbon gas chromatography, light hydrocarbon component analysis, intersection chart

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 韩大匡. 深度开发高含水油田提高采收率问题的探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5):47-55,98.
HAN Dakuang.An approach to deep development of high water-cut oil fields to improve oil recovery[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1995,22(5):47-55,98.
[2] 孙晔. 水驱油技术现状及发展趋势[J].化工设计通讯,2021,47(10):51-52,105.
SUN Ye.Current situation and development trend of water drive technology[J]. Chemical Engineering Design Communications,2021,47(10):51-52,105.
[3] 胡杨曼曼,鲍渊,田小燕.油田注水开发后期提升采油率的技术措施[J].化工设计通讯,2022,48(1):44-46.
HU YANG Manman, BAO Yuan, TIAN Xiaoyan.Technical measures for increasing oil recovery in the late stage of oilfield water injection development[J]. Chemical Engineering Design Communications,2022,48(1):44-46.
[4] 朱焱,侯连华,李士奎,等.利用地球化学资料评价水淹层方法研究:以大庆杏南油田为例[J].地球化学,2007,36(5):507-515.
ZHU Yan, HOU Lianhua, LI Shikui, et al.Evaluation method for waterflooded zone with geochemical data: A case study from Xingnan oilfield, Daqing, China[J]. Geochimica,2007,36(5):507-515.
[5] 王贵彬,郧国立,王研,等.地化录井技术在吉林油田开发井解释评价中的应用[J].录井工程,2008,19(2):41-44,77.
WANG Guibin, YUN Guoli, WANG Yan, et al.The application of geochemical logging technology in the interpretation and evaluation of development wells in Jilin Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2008,19(2):41-44,77.
[6] 谢辉,周金堂.地化录井水淹层评价技术在河南油田的应用[J].录井工程,2004,15(3):25-28,59.
XIE Hui, ZHOU Jintang.Application of the geochemical logging evaluation technology for the watered-out reservoir in Henan Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2004,15(3):25-28,59.
[7] 马越蛟,张红梅,田晓冬,等.南堡凹陷水淹层地化识别与评价技术研究[J].石油地质与工程,2014,28(5):98-102.
MA Yuejiao, ZHANG Hongmei, TIAN Xiaodong, et al.Study on geochemical identification and evaluation technology of water flooded layer in Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2014,28(5):98-102.
[8] 石油工业标准化技术委员会石油测井专业标准化委员会.水淹层测井资料处理与解释规范:SY/T 6178-2017[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2017.
Petroleum Logging Professinoal Standardization Committee of CPSC/TC. Specification for water flooded zone well logging data processing and interpreting:SY/T 6178-2017[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2017.
[9] 张幸福,周嘉玺.陆相复杂断块油田精细油藏描述技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
ZHANG Xingfu, ZHOU Jiaxi.Fine reservoir description technology in continental complex fault block oilfields[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2002.
[10] 侯读杰,张敏.油藏及开发地球化学导论[M].北京:石油工出版社,2001.
HOU Dujie, ZHANG Min.Introduction to geochemistry of reservoir and development[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2001.
[11] 郎东升,张文生,岳兴举,等.油田开发水淹层录井评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006:9.
LANG Dongsheng, ZHANG Wensheng, YUE Xingju, et al.Mud logging evaluation technology of watered-out zone in oilfield development[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2006:9.
[1] 郭明宇, 田青青. 基于随钻岩石热解参数的原油密度预测模型[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 14-21.
[2] 田立强, 熊亭, 邓卓峰, 梁欣怡, 田宇, 雷宇田. 基于地化录井技术的储层快速评价方法研究——以恩平凹陷北部斜坡带为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 32-38.
[3] 曹英权, 蒋钱涛, 熊亭, 袁胜斌, 邓卓峰. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷古近系高电阻率水层录井识别方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(3): 74-80.
[4] 符强, 谭忠健, 李鸿儒, 郭明宇, 刘志伟, 苑仁国. 基于气测与地化多参数组合的录井油气水解释模型[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2): 65-71.
[5] 徐哲, 倪有利, 王宇, 杜鹏, 吐洪江, 李晗. 油基钻井液条件下页岩油储层岩石热解参数校正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 41-46.
[6] 付基友, 罗宏斌, 陈乃志, 张智慧, 张立明, 魏世亮. 火成岩储层水平井随钻录井综合评价技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 35-40.
[7] 朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66.
[8] 李艳霞, 郭明宇, 李鸿儒, 田青青, 方铁园, 黄子舰. 渤海垦利10-2区块录井综合解释评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 67-72.
[9] 王俊, 杨世亮, 张丽艳, 肖光武, 张艳茹, 李菁. 古龙页岩油储层岩石热解参数S1值校正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 1-7.
[10] 王海涛, 阎荣辉, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 田青青, 李艳霞. 基于岩石热解法的原油密度、粘度预测模型研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 18-23.
[11] 李怀军, 罗宏斌, 郁莹, 徐永华, 肖胜, 方剑. 准噶尔盆地南缘区块油基钻井液条件下录井技术的选取[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 38-45.
[12] 彭业雄, 黄治梁, 李仕芳, 贾浩, 方铁园, 刘芳芳. 多种录井技术在水平井射孔井段优选中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 60-64.
[13] 李伟, 杨鹏波, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 刘涛, 焦艳爽. 多种录井技术在彭阳区块特殊油气藏评价中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 79-83.
[14] 李战奎, 刘广明, 郭明宇, 苑仁国, 刘松宇, 戴珩. 基于实时录井资料提高录井解释符合率的研究及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 59-65.
[15] 宋昀轩, 王雷, 蔡军, 鲁法伟. 地化录井技术在油基钻井液环境下储层流体性质识别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 66-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李戈东. 录井参数定量判别油水层方法研究及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 16 -19 .
[2] 方锡贤. 元素录井资料在页岩油勘探中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 1 -8 .
[3] 刘有武. 元素录井在陇东区块长7段致密油储层水平井地质导向中的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 40 -46 .
[4] 陈启南, 程俊生, 冯国良, 杨德强, 刘畅. 大湾区块陡坡带沙三中亚段砂砾岩体沉积特征及成因探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 106 -111 .
[5] 杜家满, 赵永刚, 申荣荣, 于明航, 阴旭航. 鄂北S井区盒8上亚段砂体叠置类型及其对气藏分布的影响[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 119 -126 .
[6] 丰帆, 袁胜斌, 张振波, 熊亭, 汪芯, 刘畅. 基于FLAIR实时流体录井资料的油层产能预测方法——以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 20 -26 .
[7] 张文雅, 刘治恒, 郝晋美, 朱更更, 张春阳, 吴明松. 元素录井技术在鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油岩性识别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 35 -41 .
[8] 王拓夫, 徐哲, 梁治国, 郝涛, 杜鹏, 李洪健. 多因素影响下的气测数据综合校正技术[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 唐诚, 袁艳丽, 梁波, 王崇敬. 川西地区雷四段海相碳酸盐岩地层录井综合评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 61 -66 .
[10] 李建成, 徐声驰, 李立, 李晨, 董彪, 和丽安. 准东阜康凹陷XRD录井多层感知器法储层物性评价探索[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 74 -78 .