录井工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 127-135.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2024.01.020

• 地质研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

滨里海盆地石炭系储层综合分析与地质储量评估

贾然①,②   

  1. ①中国石油集团录井技术研发中心;
    ②中国石油集团长城钻探工程有限公司录井公司
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-31 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-04-09
  • 作者简介:贾然 高级工程师,1987年生,2009年本科毕业于长江大学资源勘查工程专业,2016年硕士毕业于东北石油大学地质工程专业,现在中国石油集团长城钻探工程有限公司录井公司从事提高采收率实验工作。通信地址:124010 辽宁省盘锦市石油大街77号。电话:15942782626。E-mail:63619105@qq.com

Comprehensive analysis and geologic reserve evaluation of Carboniferous reservoirs in the Marginal Caspian Basin

JIA Ran①,②   

  1. ①Research and Development Center of Mud logging Technology,CNPC, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China;
    ②GWDC Mud Logging Company, CNPC, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China
  • Received:2024-01-31 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-09

摘要: 滨里海盆地石炭系为碳酸盐岩地层,主要发育KT-Ⅰ与 KT-Ⅱ两套含油层系,该区域分析化验资料较少,储层综合分析不全面,储量评估难度大。采用天然岩心,综合运用岩石薄片、高压压汞、孔渗分析等技术手段,对KT-Ⅰ与 KT-Ⅱ层进行岩石学特征分析、储层物性及空间类型分析、储层渗流特征分析。综合分析结果表明:两套含油层系为典型的特低孔、特低渗储层,局部发育微裂缝,孔渗参数变化大,非均质性较强;KT-Ⅰ层渗流通道发育优于KT-Ⅱ层,根据渗流实验结果把两套储层划分为油气水三套系统的不同阶段。依据室内实验数据及测井解释成果进行储层识别与地质储量评估,单位面积(1 km2)地质储量为47.21×104 t,单位面积(1 km2)注水开发可采储量为21.75×104 t。该研究结果可为滨里海盆地石炭系储层油气资源评价及开发方案编制提供指导依据。

关键词: 储层分析, 石炭系, 碳酸盐岩, 储量评估, 滨里海盆地

Abstract: The Carboniferous system in the Marginal Caspian Basin is a carbonate formation, mainly developings two sets of oil-bearing series, KT-Ⅰand KT-Ⅱ. There is limited analysis and testing data in this area,and the comprehensive analysis of the reservoirs is not systematic,making reserve assessment difficult. In this paper, natural cores, thin sections, high-pressure mercury injection, porosity and permeability analysis and other technical means are comprehensively used to carry out the analysis of petrology characteristics, reservoir physical properties and spatial types, and reservoir seepage characteristics on reservoirs KT-Ⅰ and KT-Ⅱ. The comprehensive analysis results show that two sets of oil-bearing series are typical ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoirs, with local micro fractures, large changes in porosity and permeability parameters, and strong heterogeneity. The development of seepage channels in KT-Ⅰ reservoir is better than that in KT-Ⅱ reservoir. Based on the results of seepage experiments, the two sets of reservoirs are divided into different stages of oil, gas and water systems. Based on in-house experimental data and well logging interpretation results, the reservoirs were identified and the geologic reserves were assessed. The geologic reserve per unit area (1 km2) is 47.21×104 t. The per unit area (1 km2) of waterflood development is 21.75×104 t. The research results can provide reference for the evaluation of oil and gas resources and the formulation of development plans for the Carboniferous reservoirs in the Marginal Caspian Basin.

Key words: reservoir analysis, Carboniferous system, carbonate rock, reserve assessment, Marginal Caspian Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.1
[1] 滕怡葳. 滨里海盆地东缘石炭系沉积相及储层特征研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2018.
TENG Yiwei.Study on Carboniferous sedimentary phases and reservoir characteristics in the eastern margin of Marginal Caspian Basin[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2018.
[2] 贾然. 欢北杜家台低渗透油藏储层非均质性研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2016.
JIA Ran.Heterogeneity of low permeability reservoir in Huanbei Dujiatai[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum niversity,2016.
[3] 周亚彤. 滨里海盆地石油地质特征及勘探实例分析[D].中国石油大学,2009.
ZHOU Yatong.Petroleum geological characteristics and exploration case analysis of Marginal Caspian Basin[D]. Beijing: China Petroleum University,2009.
[4] 贾然,邓南,徐德月,等.高尚堡油田G 5断块储集层敏感性评价[J].录井工程,2019,30(3):154-159.
JIA Ran, DENG Nan, XU Deyue, et al.Reservoir sensitivity evaluation of G 5 fault block in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2019,30(3):154-159.
[5] 周伟. 碳酸盐岩储层评价技术研究[D].荆州:长江大学,2012.
ZHOU Wei.Study on evaluation technology of carbonate reservoir[D]. Jingzhou:Yangtze University,2012.
[6] 贾然. 油田注水开发的创新方式研究[J].理论与创新,2020,20(9):222-223.
JIA Ran.Study on innovative ways of water injection development in oilfield[J]. Theory and Innovation,2020,20(9):222-223.
[7] 徐传会,钱桂华,张建球,等.滨里海盆地油气地质特征与成藏组合[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009.
XU Chuanhui, QIAN Guihua, ZHANG Jianqiu, et al.Oil and gas geological characteristics and reservoir-forming combination in Marginal Caspian Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.
[8] 贾然. 储层微观非均质性及提高采收率研究:以欢北杜家台储层为例[J].石油石化物资采购,2021(2):48-50.
JIA Ran. Study on reservoir micro-heterogeneity and enhanced oil recovery: Taking Huanbei Dujiatai reservoir as an example[J]. Petroleum & Petrochemical Material Procurement,2021(2):48-50.
[9] 张玲,侯庆宇,庄丽,等.储量估算方法在缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏的应用[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(1):24-27.
ZHANG Ling, HOU Qingyu, ZHUANG Li, et al.Application of reserves estimation method in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(1):24-27.
[10] 贾然. 高尚堡油田G 5断块储集层微观非均质性研究[J].录井工程,2021,32(1):120-126.
JIA Ran.Study on reservoir micro-heterogeneity of G 5 fault block in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2021,32(1):120-126.
[1] 唐诚, 袁艳丽, 梁波, 王崇敬. 川西地区雷四段海相碳酸盐岩地层录井综合评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 61-66.
[2] 谢姗, 徐文, 焦扬, 薛云龙, 李琳. 一种低渗碳酸盐岩气藏气井积液的早期判识方法[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2): 57-64.
[3] 艾笛, 姚亚彬, 芮昀, 魏宝军, 郭宁, 丁邦春. 滇黔北坳陷灯影组岩溶地层测井响应特征[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 112-117.
[4] 曲文波. 川西雷口坡组气藏录井地质导向方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(2): 109-114.
[5] 郑丽君. 辽河坳陷雷家地区碳酸盐岩致密油解释评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 62-66.
[6] 于伟高, 张瑞雪, 苗雪, 徐婕, 谢静平, 陈金平, 张玉新. XRD矿物分析技术在杨税务潜山勘探中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(1): 35-41.
[7] 郭晶, 秦文凯. 古城地区碳酸盐岩储集层录井评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2018, 29(4): 44-48.
[8] 夏相成, 佘明军, 刘燕函, 仝惠敏, 毛学斌. 水平井开发低渗薄层碳酸盐岩油藏关键技术——以让纳若尔油田为例[J]. 录井工程, 2018, 29(3): 22-27.
[9] 董振国. 湖南保靖区块碳酸盐岩地层压力评价技术[J]. 录井工程, 2018, 29(2): 13-18.
[10] 谭伟雄,张志虎,马猛,李琰,杜波. X射线元素录井与测井结合识别碳酸盐岩岩性[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(04): 12-15,21.
[11] 陈兵,冉飞,陈清贵,唐四城,简银波 . 塔河油田复杂碳酸盐岩储集层随钻流体识别技术[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(04): 7-11.
[12] 赵磊,唐家琼,尹平,阮聪,刘哿行,朱茜霞,唐谢. 录井参数识别安岳气田磨溪区块龙王庙组气藏气水层新方法[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(03): 91-94,99.
[13] 李 义. 塔东地区录井现场碳酸盐岩定量分析技术[J]. 录井工程, 2017, 28(02): 23-28.
[14] 杨 金 莉. 机械能指数在义和庄地区下古生界碳酸盐岩储集层识别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(04): 16-20.
[15] 阚留杰 毛 敏 陈 伟 胡 云 刘如明. 渤海油田潜山界面识别录井技术及其组合[J]. 录井工程, 2016, 27(03): 79-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋涛, 陈添, 梁欣怡, 田宇, 刘世杰, 柴晓武. 基于极值分析的钻井参数刺峰噪点数据识别研究[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 9 -15 .
[2] 郭明宇, 田青青. 基于随钻岩石热解参数的原油密度预测模型[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 14 -21 .
[3] 李戈东. 录井参数定量判别油水层方法研究及应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 16 -19 .
[4] 方锡贤. 元素录井资料在页岩油勘探中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 1 -8 .
[5] 刘有武. 元素录井在陇东区块长7段致密油储层水平井地质导向中的研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 40 -46 .
[6] 李冬蕾, 胡琳, 王建伟, 邓薇, 贾元钊, 柴晓武. 低阻水淹层地化录井识别技术在南海北部A油田的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 52 -60 .
[7] 陈启南, 程俊生, 冯国良, 杨德强, 刘畅. 大湾区块陡坡带沙三中亚段砂砾岩体沉积特征及成因探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 106 -111 .
[8] 杜家满, 赵永刚, 申荣荣, 于明航, 阴旭航. 鄂北S井区盒8上亚段砂体叠置类型及其对气藏分布的影响[J]. 录井工程, 2024, 35(1): 119 -126 .
[9] 丰帆, 袁胜斌, 张振波, 熊亭, 汪芯, 刘畅. 基于FLAIR实时流体录井资料的油层产能预测方法——以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 20 -26 .
[10] 张文雅, 刘治恒, 郝晋美, 朱更更, 张春阳, 吴明松. 元素录井技术在鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油岩性识别中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(4): 35 -41 .