气动自升降脱气器的研制与应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2021.04.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 钻井过程中,对上返钻井液的脱气采样是关系气测录井准确性和有效性的前提条件。目前国内录井最常采用的脱气方式是将脱气器固定安装在出口缓冲槽内,通过丝杠、铰链等上下调节装置人工控制脱气筒浸入钻井液的深度,这种方式极易受到缓冲槽钻井液液面上下波动的影响,导致脱气采样条件不稳定,影响气测结果的准确性。通过采用气动肌腱、压力感应放大器、先导执行阀等气动控制元件及技术,改造传统的脱气器安装方式,可以实现脱气器对波动的钻井液液面的气动自适应升降,确保脱气采样的连贯性和一致性。与定量脱气器和电控液位自适应脱气器相比较,纯气动控制的自升降脱气器在满足防爆要求的同时,成本更低,重量更轻,方便现场的安装和维护。经现场应用测试,气动自升降脱气器能够对出口缓冲槽液面波动做出及时反馈,有效保证气测录井结果的准确性,并能有效降低频繁上下调节脱气器位置的人力支出。

关键词: 气动, 自升降, 脱气器, 钻井液液面, 气测录井

Abstract: The degassing and sampling of the lifting drilling fluid is a precondition for the accuracy and effectiveness of gas logging in drilling. The most common method of degassing currently used in domestic logging is to fix the degasser in outlet buffer tank, and manually control the depth of degassing cylinder immersed into the drilling fluid through up-and-down adjustment devices like screw and hinge, which is extremely susceptible to the fluctuation of drilling fluid level in the buffer tank, leading to unstable degassing sampling conditions and affecting the accuracy of gas logging results. Transformation of traditional degasser installation method through pneumatic muscle, pressure sensing amplifier, and pilot actuator valve can realize the pneumatic self-adaptive lifting of the degasser to the fluctuating drilling fluid level, ensuring the continuity and consistency of degassing sampling. Compared with quantitative degasser and electronically controlled liquid level adaptive degasser, the purely pneumatically controlled self-lifting degasser meets the explosion-proof requirements, costs lower and weights lighter, and is convenient for on-site installation and maintenance. Field application test shows that the pneumatic self-lifting degasser can give timely feedback on the fluctuation of the outlet buffer tank liquid level, effectively guarantee the accuracy of the gas logging results, and effectively reduce the labor expenditure for frequently adjusting the position of the degasser up and down.

Key words: pneumatic, self-lifting, degasser, drilling fluid level, gas logging

中图分类号:

TE132.1

郑周俊, 李东衡, 张良, 吴振亚, 谢平, 孔轶. 气动自升降脱气器的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 105-108.

ZHENG Zhoujun, LI Dongheng, ZHANG Liang, WU Zhenya, XIE Ping, KONG Yi. Development and application of pneumatic self-lifting degasser[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2021, 32(4): 105-108.

参考文献

[1] 崔树清,王福生,董双波. 钻井地质[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社,2008.
CUI Shuqing,WANG Fusheng,DONG Shuangbo. Drilling geology[M]. Tianjin:Tianjin University Press,2008.
[2] 文汉云,陆永钢. 录井仪器原理[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2016.
WEN Hanyun,LU Yonggang. Principles of logging tools[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2016.
[3] 严国平,武庆河. 脱气器的现状及发展趋势探讨[J]. 录井工程,1999,11(1):10-14.
YAN Guoping,WU Qinghe. Current situation and development trend of degasser[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,1999,11(1):10-14.
[4] 韩性礼,林泽华,朱宏洁. 差分色谱分析技术在气测录井中的应用[J]. 录井工程,2007,18(2):20-22.
HAN Xingli,LIN Zehua,ZHU Hongjie. Application of differential chromatographic analysis in gas logging[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2007,18(2):20-22.
[5] 上海神开石油科技有限公司. 一种自升降脱气装置:201811353912.1[P].2018-11-14.
Shanghai Shenkai Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. Self-lifting degassing device:201811353912.1[P]. 2018-11-14.
[6] 李开荣,陈俊男,宋金鑫,等. 自适应液位电动脱气器的研制与应用[J]. 录井工程,2020,31(1):91-96.
LI Kairong,CHEN Junnan,SONG Jinxin,et al. Development and application of adaptive liquid level engine degasser[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2020,31(1):91-96.
[7] 李开荣. 浮球磁感应式自动升降脱气器特点与现场试验[J]. 录井工程,2016,27(4):67-70.
LI Kairong. Features and field test of floating ball magnetic induction type automatic lifting degasser[J]. Mud Logging Engineering,2016,27(4):67-70.
[8] 中国石油集团西部钻探工程有限公司. 浮球式液位感应装置和自动调节脱气器:201620104679.3[P].2016-08-03.
CNPC Xibu Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd. Floating ball type liquid level sensing device and automatic adjustment degasser:201620104679.3[P]. 2016-08-03.
[9] 上海神开石油科技有限公司. 一种气动自升降脱气装置:202011432817.8[P].2020-12-09.
Shanghai Shenkai Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. Pneumatic self-lifting degassing device:202011432817.8[P]. 2020-12-09.

相关文章 15

[1]	隋泽栋, 黄国荣, 徐永华, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 金庭科. 油基钻井液对气测录井解释方法影响的实验分析及研究——以准噶尔盆地南缘地区为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(1): 68-75.
[2]	景社, 蔡军, 王雷, 兰晶晶, 袁胜斌. 油基钻井液条件下气测衍生参数法的构建与在流体判识中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 54-60.
[3]	妥红, 满继琼, 杨明清, 彭俊民, 陈玖国. 机械自浮式脱气器的设计与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(4): 107-111.
[4]	朱连丰. 姬塬地区长9段致密砂岩储层流体性质解释方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 60-66.
[5]	刘达贵, 杨琳, 牟兴羽, 莫倩雯, 安虹伊, 唐锐峰. 页岩气铂金箱体录井响应特征及其在川南水平井随钻解释中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(3): 78-83.
[6]	滕飞启, 衣德强, 王嘉鑫, 吴明松, 贾连超, 李永胜. 基于气测衍生参数的储层含气性评价方法探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 42-45.
[7]	王瑞科, 陈沛, 安东岭, 胡科, 莫国炎. 基于气测录井资料的复杂储层流体快速识别评价技术在文昌X区的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(2): 46-51.
[8]	刘春锋, 熊志武, 周平. 西湖凹陷低孔低渗储层气测录井识别技术[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 46-50.
[9]	吴佳, 陈灿珠, 殷文荣, 孔越, 孙颖, 何成山. 气测录井响应特征与试油效果产能评价方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2022, 33(1): 69-72.
[10]	李伟, 杨鹏波, 黄子舰, 方铁园, 刘涛, 焦艳爽. 多种录井技术在彭阳区块特殊油气藏评价中的综合应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(4): 79-83.
[11]	王超, 周伟军, 张方贵, 彭立才, 贺震. 新疆玛湖凹陷区气测解释方法研究[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(3): 63-68.
[12]	彭泽阳, 张永贵, 龙胜祥, 卢婷, 王濡岳. 基于气测全烃影响机理的气测全烃修正方法[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 17-21.
[13]	武志超, 李秀彬, 解俊昱, 李晨, 于铁, 郭鹏. 自平衡式脱气器的研发与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 104-108.
[14]	宋明会. 鄂尔多斯盆地彭阳地区长3储集层气测录井解释评价方法研究与应用[J]. 录井工程, 2021, 32(1): 80-85.
[15]	王雷, 蔡军, 景社, 鲁法伟. 西湖凹陷低渗储集层气测录井定量解释评价方法[J]. 录井工程, 2020, 31(3): 86-89.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed